冠状动脉支架内再狭窄病变与原发病变药物洗脱支架治疗的对比研究Comparison of drug eluting stent for treatment of intrastent restenosis and de novo lesion
朱玮玮,郭成军,刘现亮,宋洪勇,丁冠桥,赵林
摘要(Abstract):
目的比较药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗支架内再狭窄病变(ISR)与冠状动脉原发病变(De novo)患者的长期临床疗效。方法收集2008年10月至2011年11月在北京安贞医院因ISR接受DES置入治疗的患者作为试验组(ISR组),选择同期因冠状动脉原发病变(De novo)置入DES治疗的患者作为对照组(De novo组)。比较两组患者1年的主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括全因死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶病变血运重建(TLR)。结果 204例患者入选ISR组,494例患者入选De novo组。ISR组糖尿病患病率明显高于De novo组(36.6%比27.1%,P<0.05),ISR组不稳定型心绞痛比例明显低于De novo组(26.0%比70.6%,P<0.01),其余基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组在病变部位、病变类型、病变特点方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而ISR组支架直径明显小于De novo组,差异有统计学意义[(2.72±0.36)mm比(3.08±0.54)mm,P<0.01)。ISR组MACE发生率明显高于De novo组(21.1%比14.2%,P<0.05),其中,ISR组TLR明显高于De novo组(17.2%比10.7%,P<0.05)。结论 DES治疗ISR患者安全有效,但与治疗冠状动脉原发病变比,TLR明显升高。
关键词(KeyWords): 药物洗脱支架;冠状动脉原发病变;支架内再狭窄;靶病变血运重建
基金项目(Foundation): 首都医科大学基础与临床合作课题(13JL42)
作者(Author): 朱玮玮,郭成军,刘现亮,宋洪勇,丁冠桥,赵林
参考文献(References):
- [1]Hao PP,Chen YG,Wang XI,et al.Efficacy and safety of drugeluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction:fl meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Tex HcartInst,2010,37:516-524.
- [2]Suzuki S,Ishii H,Matsudaira K,et al.Long-Term Outcome of DrugEluting vs.Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circ J,2013,77:2024-2031.
- [3]Almalla M,Schr?der J,Pross V,et al.Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of bare metal stent restenosis.Am J Cardiol,2011,108:518-522.
- [4]高展,杨跃进,陈纪林,等.药物洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄的对照研究.中华内科杂志,2009,48:122-125.
- [5]郑心田,陈康寅,RHA Seung-Woon,等.不同药物洗脱支架在冠状动脉弥漫性长病变中的2年随访结果比较.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013,21:354-357.
- [6]侯青,乔树宾,高润霖,等.冠状动脉支架术后再狭窄的预测因素.中华心血管病杂志,2005,33:61-64.
- [7]Sato T,Ono T,Morimoto Y,et al.Differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes with different drug-eluting stents in Japanese patients with and without diabetes mellitus.J Cardiol,2012,60:361-366.
- [8]Rathore S,Kaul U.Percutaneous coronary intervention in small coronary vessels:from balloon angioplasty to drug eluting stent era.Indian Heart J,2011,63:228-233.
- [9]Freixa X,Almasood AS,Khan SQ,et al.Choice of stent and outcomes after treatmentof drug-eluting stent restenosis in highly complex lesions.Catheter CardiovascInterv,2013,81:e16-22.
- [10]Williams DO,Holubkov R,Yeh W,et al.Percutaneous coronary intervention in the current era compared with 1985–1986:the National Heart,Lung,and Blood In stitute Registries.Circulation2000,102:2945-2951.
- [11]Grewe PH,Deneke T,Machraoui A,et al.Acute and chronic tissue response to coronary stent implantation:pathologic findings in human specimen.Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35:157-163.
- [12]Hoffmann R,Mintz GS.Coronary in-stent restenosis-predictors,treatment and prevention.Eur Heart J,2000,21:1739-1749.
- [13]Hikita H,Kuroda S,Kawaguchi N,et al.Differential characteristics of inflammatory responses to stent implantation between de novo and intrastent restenosis lesion in patients with stable angina.Angiology,2012,63:92-95.