压力感知导管和二代冷冻球囊消融治疗持续性心房颤动效果的回顾性研究Retrospective study of the effects of contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation and secondgeneration cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
白剑,徐伟,李晓宏,沈文志,刘宇,陈诤,顾蓉,高玲
摘要(Abstract):
目的比较压力感知导管和二代冷冻球囊消融治疗持续性心房颤动(房颤)的效果和安全性。方法回顾性连续入选2016年12月至2018年12月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院首次行压力感知导管或二代冷冻球囊消融的持续性房颤患者201例,根据患者使用的手术方式不同分为压力感知导管组(146例)和二代冷冻球囊组(55例)。观察两组患者术中X线曝光时间、手术操作时间、手术相关并发症及术后1年房颤/心房扑动(房扑)/房性心动过速(房速)复发情况。结果两组患者各项基线资料指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);二代冷冻球囊组手术操作时间短于压力感知导管组[(127.9±35.1)min比(158.3±48.5)min,P<0.001],而X线暴露时间长于压力感知导管组[(27.8±11.5)min比(12.1±6.3)min,P<0.001],差异均有统计学意义;两组患者各种手术并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);压力感知导管组和二代冷冻球囊组患者术后1年房颤/房扑/房速的复发率分别为24.0%和25.5%,Log-rank检验比较两组患者无房颤/房扑/房速生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.811)。结论使用压力感知导管或二代冷冻球囊消融治疗持续性房颤,疗效及安全性相当。
关键词(KeyWords): 持续性心房颤动;肺静脉电隔离;射频消融;冷冻球囊消融
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(81870291)
作者(Author): 白剑,徐伟,李晓宏,沈文志,刘宇,陈诤,顾蓉,高玲
参考文献(References):
- [1] Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation:recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions,endpoints, and research trial design. Europace, 2012, 14(4):528-606.
- [2] Mugnai G, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, et al. Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon versus conventional radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol,2014, 113(9):1509-1513.
- [3] Lin D, Santangeli P, Zado ES, et al. Electrophysiologicfindings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2015, 26(4):371-377.
- [4] Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing:Toccata study. Heart Rhythm, 2012, 9(1):18-23.
- [5] Straube F, Dorwarth U, Vogt J, et al. Differences of two cryoballoon generations:insights from the prospective multicenter,multinational FREEZE cohort substudy. Europace, 2014, 16(10):1434-1442
- [6] Reddy VY, Sediva L, Petru J, et al. Durability of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon abation:results from the Sustained PV Isolation with Arctic Front Advance(SUPIR)study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2015, 26(5):493-500.
- [7] Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICASⅡ:optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace, 2015, 17(8):1229-1235.
- [8] Jourda F, Providencia R, Marijon E, et al. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrialfibrillation-a prospective evaluation. Europace, 2015, 17(2):225-231.
- [9] Squara F, Zhao A, Marijon E, et al. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation:a multicentre European evaluation. Europace, 2015, 17(5):718-724.
- [10]李晓枫,刘俊,张浩,等.第二代冷冻球囊消融治疗阵发性心房颤动的临床效果观察.中华心律失常学杂志,2018, 22(5):419-423.
- [11] Brooks AG, Stiles MK, Laborderie J, et al. Outcomes of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation ablation:asystematic review.Heart Rhythm, 2010, 7(6):835-846.
- [12] Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, et al. Comlplexity and distribution of drivers in relation to duration of persistent atrialfibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 69(10):1257-1269.
- [13] Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrialfibrillation. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(19):1812-1822.
- [14] Yubing W, Yanping X, Zhiyu L, et al. Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for persisatent atrial fibrillation.Medicine, 2018, 97(29):e11520.
- [15] Blandino A, Bianchi F, Grossi S, et al. Left atrial substrate modification targeting low-voltage areas for catheter ablation of atrialfibrillation:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2017, 40(2):199-212.
- [16] Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrialfibrillation. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(19):1812-1822.
- [17] Aryana A, Singh SM, Mugnai G, et al. Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrialfibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency:results of a multicenter analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2016,47(3):341-348.
- [18] Ciconte G, Ottaviano L, de Asmundis C, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation as index procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation:Oneyear clinical outcome after ablation using the second-generation cryoballoon. Heart Rhythm, 2015, 12(1):60-66.
- [19] Metzner A, Reissmann B, Rausch P, et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2014, 7(2):288-292.
- [20] Koektuerk B, Yorgun H, Hengeoez O, et al. Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrialfibrillation one-year outcome using second generation cryoballoon.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2015, 8(5):1073-1079.
- [21] Straube F, Hartl S, Dorwarth U, et al. Cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrialfibrillation-Large single-center experience. J Cardiol,2016, 68(6):492-497.
- [22] Tscholl V, Lsharaf AKA, Lin T, et al. Two years outcome in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon-long-term efficacy of cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrialfibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 2016, 13(9):1817-1822.
- [23] Andrade JG, Khairy P, Guerra PG, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation:a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm, 2011, 8(9):1444-1451.
- [24]陶海龙,马长生,董建增,等.心房颤动导管消融术后极晚期复发及相关因素的研究.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2010,18(3):142-146.
- [25]王传慧,郁怡,王群山,等.导管消融术联合心腔内电复律治疗非阵发性心房颤动的远期复发因素研究.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(6):301-304.