Meta分析:冠状动脉内应用替罗非班用于急性冠状动脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效The efficacy of intracoronary administration of tirofiban for acute coronary syndrome patients during percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis
钱翠平,彭稳中,张予,郭小梅
摘要(Abstract):
目的比较替罗非班经冠状动脉内注射与经静脉内注射在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的疗效。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)、Cochrane图书馆,全面收集在ACS患者的治疗中,替罗非班冠状动脉内及静脉内给药初始剂量的随机对照研究。对纳入的研究进行资料提取后采用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan5.2统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共收集25篇符合纳入标准的随机对照研究,共计2516例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与替罗非班静脉内给药(IV组)相比,冠状动脉内给予(IC组)替罗非班更能显著增加PCI术后TIMIⅢ级血流比率(RR 1.15,95%CI 1.07~1.23,P=0.0001);PCI术后1周心脏超声评价两组左心室射血分数(LVEF)差异具有统计学意义,IC组LVEF较IV组平均增加2.69%(WMD 2.69,95%CI 0.14~5.25,P=0.04);冠状动脉内给予替罗非班更能有效降低PCI术后30 d随访主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.38~0.69,P<0.0001)。然而,PCI术后两组出血并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.76~1.19,P=0.64)。结论冠状动脉内给予替罗非班相比静脉内给予替罗非班更能有效增加冠状动脉血流和微血管灌注,能显著减少PCI术后随访30 d不良心血管事件的发生率,改善预后,且不增加出血风险。
关键词(KeyWords): 急性冠状动脉综合征;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;冠状动脉内;替罗非班
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(81270353)
作者(Author): 钱翠平,彭稳中,张予,郭小梅
参考文献(References):
- [1]Anderson J L,Adams C D,Antman E M,et al.ACC/AHA 2007Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:e1-e157.
- [2]Lefkovits J,Plow E F,Topol E J.Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors in cardiovascular medicine.N Engl J Med,1995,332:1553-1559.
- [3]Anderson JL,Adams CD,Antman EM,et al.ACC/AHA 2007guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/nonST-Elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:e1-e157.
- [4]Van de Werf F,Bax J,Betriu A,et al.Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent STsegment elevation The Task Force on the management of STsegment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur Heart J,2008,29:2909-2945.
- [5]De Vita M,Coluccia V,Burzotta F,et al.Intracoronary use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in percutaneous coronary interventions.Curr Vasc Pharmacol,2012,10:448-453.
- [6]Zhu TQ,Zhang Q,Qiu JP,et al.Benefi cial effects of intracoronary tirofiban bolus administration following upstream intravenous treatment in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention:The ICTAMI study.Int J Cardiol,2013,165:437-443.
- [7]Kīrma C,Erkol A,Pala S,et al.Intracoronary bolus-only compared with intravenous bolus plus infusion of tirofiban application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2012,79:59-67.
- [8]Erdim R,Erciyes D,Gormez S,et al.Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of tirofiban in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Anadolu Kardiyol Derg,2010,10:340-345.
- [9]Candemir B,Kilickap M,Ozcan OU,et al.Intracoronary versus intravenous high-dose bolus plus maintenance administration of tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.J Thromb Thrombolysis,2012,34:65-72.
- [10]薛成爱,沈建妹,鞠森.PCI后冠状动脉内注射替罗非班治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死46例.山东医药,2011,51:47-48.
- [11]王丽丽,刘强,李忠红,等.不同途径注射替罗非班在急性心肌梗死患者直接PCI治疗中的疗效及安全性.岭南心血管病杂志,2012,18:465-467.
- [12]陈少源,方红域,谢培益,等.冠状动脉内使用替罗非班治ST段抬高型心肌梗死的临床观察.世界临床药物,2010,31:233-236.
- [13]马震,宁彬,董西学,等.冠状动脉内应用替罗非班对STEMI急诊PCI术后心肌灌注的影响.中华全科医学,2011,9:559-560.
- [14]周浩,黄伟剑,吴高俊,等.冠状动脉内注射替罗非班对急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗ST段回落的影响.心脑血管病防治,2011,11:4-6.
- [15]杨新春,张大鹏,王乐丰,等.冠状动脉内应用国产替罗非班对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后心肌灌注和临床预后的影响.中华心血管病杂志,2007,35:517-522.
- [16]高航,孔敬博,黄广勇,等.冠状动脉内应用替罗非班对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊介入治疗的疗效和安全性.山东医药,2008,48:54-55.
- [17]官功昌,刘棣,张学军,等.冠状动脉内注射替罗非班改善直接PCI患者近期预后临床研究.陕西医学杂志,2013,42:566-568.
- [18]王鹏飞,金卫东,邢永生,等.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗中冠状动脉内注射替罗非班对TIMI血流和临床预后的影响.中国实用医药,2011,6:11-13.
- [19]王文斌,曹树军,王立中,等.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死急诊介入治疗中不同途径应用替罗非班的疗效分析.中国医药导报,2013,10:43-45.
- [20]李志娟,张薇,董平栓,等.急性心肌梗死患者介入术中冠状动脉内应用替罗非班的疗效和安全性评价.陕西医学杂志,2008,37:425-427.
- [21]李文,张鸿举,王相智,等.急性心肌梗死急诊介入术中冠状动脉内应用替罗非班的近期疗效评价.中国循证心血管医学杂志,2011,3:189-192.
- [22]金光临,刘幼文,左辉华,等.急性心肌梗死直接PCI冠状动脉内注射替罗非班预防无复流.中山大学学报:医学科学版,2009,30:185-188.
- [23]王琳.急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中冠状动脉内应用替罗非班的临床观察.吉林大学,2010.
- [24]徐元杰.静脉冠状动脉联合应用替罗非班对急性心肌梗死介入治疗心肌灌注及预后的临床研究.泰山医学院,2010.
- [25]陆传新,郑兴,秦永文,等.静脉内和冠状动脉内同时应用替罗非班在急性心肌梗死介入治疗中的疗效与安全性.第二军医大学学报,2009,30:178-182.
- [26]赵强,林梓卿,罗景云,等.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者急诊介入治疗中冠状动脉内应用替罗非班的临床观察.中国心血管杂志,2009,14:270-273.
- [27]李春华,呼铁民,张一达,等.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者替罗非班冠状动脉和静脉用药的疗效比较.中华老年医学杂志,2011,30:467-471.
- [28]何文凯,李明琰,邢晓雯,等.替罗非班不同给药方式对急性心肌梗死患者PCI预后的影响.实用医学杂志,2012,28:2936-2939.
- [29]赵玉君,王东颖,董秋立,等.替罗非班不同给药途径对急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者临床终点影响的研究.临床急诊杂志,2013,4:152-155.
- [30]陈立伟,杨明,高亢,等.替罗非班在NSTE-ACS患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前和治疗中应用的对比分析.岭南心血管病杂志,2011,17:272-275.
- [31]Sethi A,Bahekar A,Doshi H,et al.Tirofi ban use with clopidogrel and aspirin decreases adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction:A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Can J Cardiol,2011,27:548-554.
- [32]Gurbel PA,Tantry US.Delivery of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitor Therapy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Why Not Take the Intracoronary Highway?Circulation,2010,121:739-741.
- [33]Tcheng JE,Ellis SG,George BS,et al.Pharmacodynamics of chimeric glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin antiplatelet antibody Fab 7E3in high-risk coronary angioplasty.Circulation,1994,90:1757-1764.
- [34]Srinivasan M,Prasad A.Adjunctive intracoronary antithrombotic therapy:time to revisit an old strategy?J Invasive Cardiol,2009,21:224-228.
- [35]Bellandi F,Maioli M,Gallopin M,et al.Increase of myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery with intracoronary abciximab downstream of the coronary occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2004,62:186-192.
- [36]耿巍,傅向华,田祥,等.瑞替普酶溶栓成功后早期冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性及有效性研究.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013,21:310-314.