冠状动脉造影联合血流储备分数在2型糖尿病女性冠心病患者介入治疗中的应用价值Application of coronary angiography combined with fractional flow reserve in female type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary heart disease
韩雅蕾,高智强,翟东东,张萌
摘要(Abstract):
目的探讨冠状动脉造影(CAG)联合血流储备分数(FFR)在2型糖尿病女性冠心病患者介入治疗中的临床应用价值。方法选取2014年1月至2015年7月在航天中心医院接受CAG检查、证实至少有1处冠状动脉狭窄>70%、拟置入支架治疗的女性患者60例,均确诊为2型糖尿病,随机分为观察组28例和对照组32例。观察组共42处病变均应用压力导丝行心肌FFR测定,仅在FFR≤0.80的病变中置入药物洗脱支架(DES);对照组共51处病变常规置入DES。比较两组患者冠心病危险因素情况、置入支架数,手术后12个月主要不良心血管事件(MACE,包括全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、再次血运重建及因心脏原因再入院)发生率及心绞痛再发率。结果观察组28例患者,FFR≤0.80的有12例患者18处病变共置入DES 19枚;对照组32例患者51处病变共置入DES48枚。观察组平均住院费用[(2.43±1.02)万元比(5.54±2.11)万元,P=0.005]、平均置入支架数[(0.68±0.64)枚比(1.49±0.88),P=0.032]、平均手术时间[(58.4±18.1)min比(68.4±21.2)min,P=0.041]及平均对比剂用量[(148.8±32.0)ml比(197.9±45.4)ml,P=0.028]均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义。随访12个月,观察组再发心绞痛4例(14.3%),MACE事件2例(7.1%);对照组再发心绞痛4例(12.5%),MACE事件3例(9.3%),两组再发心绞痛和MACE的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 2型糖尿病女性冠心病患者介入治疗中联合应用CAG和FFR监测,可减少术中支架置入数量及对比剂用量,且并不增加近期不良心血管事件的发生率。
关键词(KeyWords): 血流储备分数;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;冠状动脉造影;2型糖尿病
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 韩雅蕾,高智强,翟东东,张萌
参考文献(References):
- [1]Schulze MB,Shai I,Rimm EB,et al.Adiponectin and future coronary heart disease events among men with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes,2005,54(1):534-539.
- [2]中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南2012(简本).中华心血管病杂志,2012,4(40):271-277.
- [3]刘海伟,韩雅玲,荆全民,等.不同性别2型糖尿病合并冠心病患者的临床及冠状动脉病变特点差异.中国医师进修杂志,2013,36(34):25-28.
- [4]Manesh P,Eric DP,David D,et al.Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.N Engl J Med,2010,362(10):886-895.
- [5]Elgendy IY,Conti CR,Bavry AA.Fractional flow reserve:an updated review.Clin Cardiol,2014,37(6):371-380.
- [6]于一,刘宇扬,史冬梅,等.血流储备分数在急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2015,23(6):353-356.
- [7]Lee BK,Choi HH,Hong KS,et al.Efficacy of fractional flow reserve measurements at side branch vessels treated with the crush stenting technique in true coronary bifurcation lesions.Clin Cardial,2010,33(8):490-494.
- [8]Pijls NH,Klauss V,Siebert U,et al.Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up:a multicenter registry.Circulation,2002,105(25):2950-2954.
- [9]Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.N Engl J Med,2009,360(3):213-224.
- [10]Kushner FG,Hand M,Smitll SC Jr,et al.2009 focused ulxlatcs:ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(updating the2004guideline and 2007 focused update)and ACC/AHA/SCAIguidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention(updating the2005 guideline and 2007 focused update):A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines.Circulation,2009,120(22):2271-2306.
- [11]Bavry AA,Elgendy IY,Petersen JW.Outcomes associated with fractional flow-guided revascularization:a meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol,2014,37(10):610-617.