定量血流分数测量对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者主要不良心血管事件发生的预测价值Predictive value of quantitative flow ratio measurement for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention
张小敏,肖栋,柏中胜,曹龙兴,彭朝梅,肖国胜
摘要(Abstract):
目的 探讨定量血流分数(QFR)对冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生的预测价值。方法 纳入2020年1—6月在厦门大学附属心血管病医院接受药物洗脱支架置入术的231例患者,所有患者术后均进行靶血管QFR值测量,总共分析了231支血管,临床终点为随访患者2年内MACE发生情况,包括心原性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、缺血驱动的血运重建。根据Youden指数将患者分成QFR>0.92组和QFR≤0.92组,根据患者是否发生MACE分成MACE组及Non-MACE组,采用单因素及多因素Cox回归分析,探讨QFR测量对PCI术后患者MACE发生的预测价值。结果 PCI术后血管的最大面积狭窄率是术后QFR值较低的预测因素。通过计算Youden指数得出PCI术后QFR预测2年内MACE的最佳临界值为0.92,根据该界值分成QFR>0.92(71.9%)组及QFR≤0.92(28.1%)组。受试者工作特征曲线得到MACE发生的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.768(95%CI 0.676~0.860,P<0.001),敏感度为0.655,特异度为0.772。PCI术后随访2年发现共有29(12.6%)例发生MACE(MACE组),其QFR值明显低于Non-MACE组患者[0.91(0.86,0.95)比0.96(0.93,0.97),P<0.05]。多因素Cox回归分析发现,PCI术后QFR≤0.92(HR 5.10,95%CI 2.27~11.44)、三支血管病变(HR 2.86,95%CI 1.31~6.24)、最大面积狭窄率(HR 1.03,95%CI 1.00~1.06)是患者发生MACE的独立危险因素。PCI术后QFR≤0.92的患者比QFR>0.92患者靶血管血运重建(TVR)的风险更高(HR 5.45,95%CI 1.36~21.77,P<0.001)。结论 QFR预测PCI术后患者2年内MACE发生的最佳临界值为0.92。发生MACE的患者QFR值较低,且QFR≤0.92、三支血管病变、最大面积狭窄率是患者PCI术后MACE发生的独立危险因素。QFR≤0.92也是患者PCI术后患者TVR的独立危险因素。
关键词(KeyWords): 定量血流分数;冠心病;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;主要不良心血管事件
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 张小敏,肖栋,柏中胜,曹龙兴,彭朝梅,肖国胜
参考文献(References):
- [1]马丽媛,王增武,樊静,等.《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2021》概要[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2022,30(7):481-496.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2022.07.001.
- [2]Aoki J,Tanabe K.Mechanisms of drug-eluting stent restenosis[J].Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2021,36(1):23-29.DOI:10.1007/s12928-020-00734-7.
- [3]Hong SJ,Hong MK.Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease:a review of recent advances[J].Expert Opin Drug Deliv,2022,19(3):269-280.DOI:10.1080/17425247.2022.2044784.
- [4]Agarwal SK,Kasula S,Hacioglu Y,et al.Utilizing post-intervention fractional flow reserve to optimize acute results and the relationship to long-term outcomes[J].JACCCardiovasc Interv,2016,9(10):1022-1031.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.046.
- [5]Piroth Z,Toth GG,Tonino PAL,et al.Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve measured immediately after drug-eluting stent implantation[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2017,10(8):e005233.DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005233.
- [6]Li SJ,Ge Z,Kan J,et al.Cutoff value and long-term prediction of clinical events by ffr measured immediately after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease:1-to 3-year results from the DKCRUSHⅦregistry study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2017,10(10):986-995.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2017.02.012.
- [7]Dattilo PB,Prasad A,Honeycutt E,et al.Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States:insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2012,60(22):2337-2339.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.990.
- [8]Xu B,Tu S,Qiao S,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of angiographybased quantitative?ow ratio measurements for online assessment of coronary stenosis[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(25):3077-3087.DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035.
- [9]Westra J,Andersen BK,Campo G,et al.Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angographyderived quantitative?ow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional?ow reserve:the FAVORⅡEurope-Japan study[J].J Am Heart Assoc,2018,7(14):e009603.DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.
- [10]Kogame N,Takahashi K,Tomaniak M,et al.Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio after percutaneous coronary intervention for 3-vessel disease[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2019,12(20):2064-2075.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.009.
- [11]杨峻青,李泽杭,涂圣贤.血流储备分数的原理、验证与发展[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(8):464-468.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2017.08.011.
- [12]刘莉莉,沈迎,涂圣贤,等.慢性完全闭塞病变行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对供血动脉定量血流分数的影响[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2021,29(3):134-135.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2021.03.004.
- [13]Tu S,Westra J,Yang J,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of fast computational approaches to derive fractional flow reserve from diagnostic coronary angiography:the international multicenter FAVOR Pilot study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2016,9(19):2024-2035.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
- [14]Montalescot G,Sechtem U,Achenbach S,et al.2013 ESCguidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease:the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology[J].Eur Heart J,2013,34(38):2949-3003.DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.
- [15]Lim S,Choo EH,Choi IJ,et al.Risks of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality in 1-year survivors of acute myocardial infarction implanted with newer-generation drugeluting stents[J].J Clin Med,2021,10(16):3642.DOI:10.3390/jcm10163642.
- [16]Zheng JF,Guo TT,Tian Y,et al.Clinical characteristics of early and late drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis and mid-term prognosis after repeated percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Chin Med J (Engl),2020,133(22):2674-2681.DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001135.
- [17]Rimac G,Fearon WF,De Bruyne B,et al.Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value:a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J].Am Heart J,2017,183:1-9.DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.005.
- [18]余作忠,杨人强.基于影像学的血流储备分数衍生指标研究进展[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2021,29(3):164-168.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2021.03.010.
- [19]Kirigaya H,Okada K,Hibi K,et al.Diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis[J].J Cardiol,2021,77(5):492-499.DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.11.002.
- [20]Xu B,Tu S,Song L,et al.Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVORⅢChina):a multicentre,randomised,sham-controlled trial[J].Lancet,2021,398(10317):2149-2159.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0.
- [21]Biscaglia S,Tebaldi M,Brugaletta S,et al.Prognostic value of qfr measured immediately after successful stent implantation:the international multicenter prospective HAWKEYE study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2019,12(20):2079-2088.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.003
- [22]Mejía-Rentería H,Lee JM,Lauri F,et al.Influence of microcirculatory dysfunction on angiography-based functional assessment of coronary stenoses[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2018,11(8):741-753.DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.014.
- [23]Abdel-Wahab M,Baev R,Dieker P,et al.Long-term clinical outcome of rotational atherectomy followed by drug-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2013,81(2):285-291.DOI:10.1002/ccd.24367.
- [24]You W,Zhou Y,Wu Z,et al.Post-PCI quantitative flow ratio predicts 3-year outcome after rotational atherectomy in patients with heavily calcified lesions[J].Clin Cardiol,2022,45(5):558-566.DOI:10.1002/clc.23816.
- [25]Erbay A,Penzel L,Abdelwahed YS,et al.Prognostic impact of pancoronary quantitative flow ratio assessment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2021,14(12):e010698.DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010698.
- [26]Kanno Y,Sugiyama T,Hoshino M,et al.Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2020,96(3):E238-E247.DOI:10.1002/ccd.28756.