胸痛中心区域协同救治体系对ST段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注时间和预后的影响Impact of regional collaborative network of chest pain centers on the rescue timeline and prognosis of patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
尚珊珊,郭欣,张燕
摘要(Abstract):
目的观察胸痛中心(CPC)区域协同救治体系对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)再灌注时间和预后的影响。方法选择直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的STEMI患者,根据是否纳入胸痛中心区域协同救治体系分为区域协同救治组(160例)和CPC成立前组(92例),比较两组患者首次医疗接触至球囊扩张(FMC-to-B)时间、入门至球囊扩张(D-to-B)时间和FMC-to-B时间<120 min、D-to-B时间<90 min达标率以及住院期间主要并发症;对患者随访6个月,比较两组患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。结果区域协同救治组FMC-to-B时间[(112.8±87.0)min比(154.5±64.1)min,P=0.022]、D-to-B时间[(84.5±47.6)min比(136.3±62.4)min,P=0.019]较CPC成立前组显著下降;而FMC-to-B时间<120 min达标率(69.6%比48.4%,P<0.001)和D-to-B时间<90 min达标率(82.7%比36.5%, P<0.001)较CPC成立前组显著增加,差异均有统计学意义。区域协同救治组患者LVEF[(58.7±3.5)%比(53.0±4.2)%,P=0.040]大于CPC成立前组,而MACE发生率(6.0%比12.7%,P=0.044)较CPC成立前组显著下降,差异均有统计学意义。结论 CPC区域协同救治体系有效缩短STEMI患者再灌注时间,减少住院期间主要并发症和改善患者预后。
关键词(KeyWords): 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;胸痛中心;区域协同救治
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 尚珊珊,郭欣,张燕
参考文献(References):
- [1]林苗,赵文涛,张敏霞,等.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时同期干预非梗死相关动脉对ST段抬高型心肌梗死多支血管病变患者预后影响.临床军医杂志,2018,46(5):552-555.
- [2]陈伟伟,高润霖,刘力生,等.《中国心血管病报告2017》概要.中国循环杂志,2018,33(1):1-8.
- [3] Li J,Li X,Wang Q,et al.ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011(the China PEACE-Retrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study):a retrospective analysis of hospital data. Lancet,2015,385(9966):441-451.
- [4]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2015, 43(5):380-393.
- [5] Gao R, Patel A, Gao W, et al. Prospective observational study of acute coronary syndromes in China:practice patterns and outcomes.Heart,2008,94(5):554-560.
- [6]周文震,周宁.胸痛区域协同救治体系的时效性研究.岭南急诊医学杂志,2019,24(1):96-98.
- [7] Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction:an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol,2016,67(10):1235-1250.
- [8] RoM, Patrono C, Collet JP,et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation:task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC). Eur Heart J,2016,37(3):267-315.
- [9] Henry TD,Jacobs AK,Granger CB. Regional systems of care for STelevation myocardial infarction:do they save lives? Am Heart J,2013,166(3):389-391.
- [10] Glickman SW, Greiner MA, Lin L, et al. Assessment of temporal trends in mortality with implementation of a statewide ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)regionalization program.Ann Emerg Med,2012,59(4):243-252.
- [11]张岩,霍勇.中国胸痛中心认证的现状和未来展望.中国医学前沿杂志,2017,9(1):1-6.
- [12]易绍东,霍勇,向定成.胸痛中心认证对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院前救治效率的影响.中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2017,9(1):11-15.
- [13]中国胸痛中心认证工作委员会.中国胸痛中心认证标准(2015年11月修订).中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(3):121-130.
- [14]张邦滢,刘莲莲,李广平,等.胸痛中心模式对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗方式及近期预后的影响.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2018, 26(9):528-534.
- [15]王晓田,李振华.区域化网络协同救治优化急性ST段抬高心肌梗死早期再灌注治疗.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013, 21(5):290-296.
- [16]张军玲.区域协同救治对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死病人再灌注时间及预后的影响.中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2016,14(22):2672-2675.
- [17] Bagai A, Al-Khalidi HR, Sherwood MW, et al. Regional systems of care demonstration project:Mission:Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator:design and methodology. Am Heart J, 2014, 167(1):15-21.e3.
- [18]裘毅钢,李田昌,陈宇,等.急救车-导管室模式对急性心肌梗死患者开通血管时间和左室功能的影响.中国循证心血管医学杂志,2015,7(1):76-79.