经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代对溶栓治疗意义的再认识
赵琳茹,李广平
摘要(Abstract):
<正>急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)治疗的首要目标为实现心肌早期再灌注,而早期再灌注治疗主要体现在尽早开通梗死相关动脉(infarction related artery,IRA)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)已经成为冠心病治疗的重要手段,而直接经皮冠状动脉
关键词(KeyWords): 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;溶栓;急性心肌梗死
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 赵琳茹,李广平
参考文献(References):
- [1]O'Gara PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD,et al.2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(4):485-510.
- [2]Taylor J.2012 ESC Guidelines on acute myocardial infarction(STEMI).Eur Heart J,2012,33(20):2501-2502.
- [3]Levine GN,Bates ER1,Blankenship JC,et al.2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction:An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction:A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.Circulation,2016,133(11):1135-1147.
- [4]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(5):380-393.
- [5]丁嵩,何奔.急性ST段抬高心肌梗死介入治疗:关注心肌的有效再灌注.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2015,23(10):573-576.
- [6]Kristensen SD,Laut KG,Fajadet J,et al.Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011:current status in 37 ESC countries.Eur Heart J,2014,35(29):1957-1970.
- [7]Al-Zakwani I,Zubaid M,Al-Riyami A,et al.Primary coronary intervention versus thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction patients in the Middle East.Int J Clin Pharm,2012,34(3):445-451.
- [8]Kunadian V,Gibson CM.Thrombolytics and myocardial infarction.Cardiovasc Ther,2012,30(2):e81-e88.
- [9]蒋立新.China PEACE研究的启示——我国迫切需要进行心肌梗死等重大疾病的医疗质量改善研究.中国循环杂志,2014,29(6):401-403.
- [10]Fletcher AP,Alkjaersig N,Smyrniotis FE,et al.The treatment of patients suffering from early myocardial infarction with massive and prolonged streptokinase therapy.Trans Assoc Am Physicians,1958,71:287-296.
- [11]Chazov EI,Matveeva LS,Mazaev AV,et al.Intracoronary administration of fibrinolysin in acute myocardial infarct.Ter Arkh,1976,48(4):8-19.
- [12]Rentrop KP,Blanke H,Karsch KR,et al.Acute myocardial infarction:intracoronary application of nitroglycerin and streptokinase.Clin Cardiol,1979,2(5):354-363.
- [13]Yusuf S,Collins R,Peto R,et al.Intravenous and intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction:overview of results on mortality,reinfarction and side-effects from 33randomized controlled trials.Eur Heart J,1985,6(7):556-585.
- [14]No authors listed.Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction.Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico(GISSI).Lancet,1986,1(8478):397-402.
- [15]Longstaff C,Williams S,Thelwell C.Fibrin binding and the regulation of plasminogen activators during thrombolytic therapy.Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem,2008,6(3):212-223.
- [16]余巧燕,孙晋民.溶栓药物的研究进展.医学理论与实践,2009,22(1):30-33.
- [17]De Luca G,Suryapranata H,Ottervanger JP,et al.Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:every minute of delay counts.Circulation,2004,109(10):1223-1225.
- [18]Jacobs AK,Antman EM,Faxon DP,et al.Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients:executive summary.Circulation,2007,116(2):217-230.
- [19]Weaver WD,Simes RJ,Betriu A,et al.Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative review.JAMA,1997,278(23):2093-2098.
- [20]Topol EJ.Acute myocardial infarction:thrombolysis.Heart,2000,83(1):122-126.
- [21]Stephan W,Kolh P,Alfonso F,et al.2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization.Rev Esp Cardiol(Engl Ed),2015,68(2):144.
- [22]Bjorklund E,Stenestrand U,Lindback J,et al.Pre-hospital thrombolysis delivered by paramedics is associated with reduced time delay and mortality in ambulance-transported real-life patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Eur Heart J,2006,27(10):1146-1152.
- [23]Pinto DS,Frederick PD,Chakrabarti AK,et al.Benefit of transferring ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients for percutaneous coronary intervention compared with administration of onsite fibrinolytic declines as delays increase.Circulation,2011,124(23):2512-2521.
- [24]Steg PG,Bonnefoy E,Chabaud S,et al.Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty:data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial.Circulation,2003,108(23):2851-2856.
- [25]GREAT Group.Feasibility,safety,and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners:Grampian region early anistreplase trial.BMJ,1992,305(6853):548-553.
- [26]Rawles J.GREAT:10 year survival of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in a randomised comparison of prehospital and hospital thrombolysis.Heart,2003,89(5):563-564.
- [27]Bonnefoy E,Lapostolle F,Leizorovicz A,et al.Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction:a randomised study.Lancet,2002,360(9336):825-829.
- [28]Armstrong PW,Gershlick AH,Van de Werf F.Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2013,369(3):280-281.
- [29]Gilmour KM,Iversen L,Hannaford PC.Long-term survival benefits of thrombolysis:the Royal College of General Practitioners'myocardial infarction study.Fam Pract,2015,32(2):192-197.
- [30]Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(ASSENT-4PCI)investigators.Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction(ASSENT-4 PCI):randomised trial.Lancet,2006,367(9510):569-578.
- [31]Zalewski J,Bogaerts K,Desmet W,et al.Intraluminal thrombus in facilitated versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention:an angiographic substudy of the ASSENT-4 PCI(Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)trial.J Am Coll Cardiol,2011,57(19):1867-1873.
- [32]So DY,Ha AC,Davies RF,et al.ST segment resolution in patients with tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus tenecteplase alone:Insights from the Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial Infarction(CAPITAL AMI)trial.Can J Cardiol,2010,26(1):e7-12.
- [33]Itoh T,Fukami K,Suzuki T,et al.Comparison of long-term prognostic evaluation between pre-intervention thrombolysis and primary coronary intervention:a prospective randomized trial:five-year results of the IMPORTANT study.Circ J,2010,74(8):1625-1634.
- [34]Han YL,Liu JN,Jing QM,et al.The efficacy and safety of pharmacoinvasive therapy with prourokinase for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected long percutaneous coronary intervention-related delay.Cardiovasc Ther,2013,31(5):285-290.
- [35]Cantor WJ,Fitchett D,Borgundvaag B,et al.Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2009,360(26):2705-2718.
- [36]Jager B,Farhan S,Kalla K,et al.One-year mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Vienna STEMI registry.Wien Klin Wochenschr,2015,127(13-14):535-542.
- [37]Arso IA,Setianto BY,Taufiq N,et al.In-hospital major cardiovascular events between STEMI receiving thrombolysis therapy and primary PCI.Acta Med Indones,2014,46(2):124-130.
- [38]Danchin N,Blanchard D,Steg PG,et al.Impact of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on 1-year outcome:results from the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry.Circulation,2004,110(14):1909-1915.
- [39]陆建辉,洪小苏,徐卫亭.急性心肌梗死介入治疗与溶栓治疗的疗效比较.苏州大学学报(医学版),2006,26(3):417-420.