郭雪原,董建增,龙德勇,喻荣辉,汤日波,白融,刘念,桑才华,蒋晨曦,李松南,马长生

• 1:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的比较持续性心房颤动(房颤)导管消融术后复发二尖瓣峡部心房扑动(房扑)患者不同消融策略,探讨复发二尖瓣峡部相关房扑的优化消融方案。方法回顾性分析2010年1月至2012年12月北京安贞医院持续性房颤导管消融后复发,术中电生理检查明确为二尖瓣峡部相关房扑的患者74例。根据再次消融时不同消融策略分为两组:心动过速下消融组(A组,43例)和复律后窦性心律下消融组(B组,31例)。消融终点均为双侧肺静脉电隔离以及左心房顶部线、二尖瓣峡部线、三尖瓣峡部线的双向传导阻滞。术后随访比较两组患者未服用抗心律失常药物情况下窦性心律的维持率。结果两组患者年龄、性别、体重指数、高血压病、糖尿病、冠心病等比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组患者二尖瓣峡部阻断、肺静脉、左心房顶部线及三尖瓣峡部消融线比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);B组患者手术时间[(132.5±29.6)min比(150.2±41.1)min,P=0.044]、透视时间[(23.1±8.6)min比(27.9±7.2)min,P=0.011]和消融时间[(14.0±4.1)min比(16.3±4.7)min,P=0.027]显著低于A组,差异均有统计学意义。平均随访(16.9±6.3)个月,两组患者窦性心律维持率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.771)。结论持续性房颤初次导管消融术后复发二尖瓣峡部相关房扑的患者,复律后窦性心律下消融与心动过速下消融相比更为简化,长期随访窦性心律维持率无显著差异。

关键词(KeyWords)： 心房颤动;导管消融术;心房扑动

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(81530016,81500270)

作者(Author): 郭雪原,董建增,龙德勇,喻荣辉,汤日波,白融,刘念,桑才华,蒋晨曦,李松南,马长生

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Chae S,Oral H,Good E,et al.Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation:mechanistic insights,results of catheter ablation,and risk factors for recurrence.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50(18):1781-1787.
• [2]Cosio FG.Macroreentrant tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.Heart Rhythm,2005,2(5):472-473.
• [3]Sawhney N,Anand K,Robertson CE,et al.Recovery of mitral isthmus conduction leads to the development of macroreentrant tachycardia after left atrial linear ablation for atrial fibrillation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2011,4(6):832-837.
• [4]Matsuo S,Wright M,Knecht S,et al.Peri-mitral atrial flutter in patients with atrial fibrillation ablation.Heart Rhythm,2010,7(1):2-8.
• [5]Ja?s P,Hocini M,Hsu LF,et al.Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmus.Circulation,2004,110(19):2996-3002.
• [6]Gaita F,Caponi D,Scaglione M,et al.Long-term clinical results of 2 different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2008,1(4):269-275.
• [7]Shah AJ,Pascale P,Miyazaki S,et al.Prevalence and types of pitfall in the assessment of mitral isthmus linear conduction block.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2012,5(5):957-967.
• [8]Jiang CX,Dong JZ,Long DY,et al.Ridge-related reentry despite apparent bidirectional mitral isthmus block.Heart Rhythm,2016,13(9):1845-1851
• [9]Bai R,Di Biase L,Mohanty P,et al.Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation:impact on outcomes from a randomized study(PROPOSE).JCardiovasc Electrophysiol,2012,23(2):137-144.
• [10]Wong KC,Qureshi N,Jones M,et al.Mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power:a single center experience.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2012.23(11):1193-1200.
• [11]Reddy VY,Ruskin JN,D'Avila A.Balloon occlusion of the coronary sinus to facilitate mitral isthmus ablation.JCardiovasc Electrophysiol,2008,19(6):651.
• [12]Wong KC,Jones M,Qureshi N,et al.Balloon occlusion of the distal coronary sinus facilitates mitral isthmus ablation.Heart Rhythm,2011,8(6):833-839.
• [13]Berruezo A,Bisbal F,Fernández-Armenta J,et al.Transthoracic epicardial ablation of mitral isthmus for treatment of recurrent perimitral flutter.Heart Rhythm,2014,11(1):26-33.