伴发左心房自发性超声显影的心房颤动患者导管消融围术期抗凝治疗Perioperative anticoagulant therapy for catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation accompanied with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast
孙鸣宇,王祖禄,梁明,杨桂棠,金志清,周薇薇,刘楠楠,韩雅玲
摘要(Abstract):
目的总结伴发左心房自发性超声显影(LASEC)的心房颤动(AF)患者导管消融围术期抗凝治疗的方法、疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析北部战区总医院心内科2018年1—12月行导管消融的AF患者595例,其中经食管超声心动图检出LASEC者147例(LASEC组),无LASEC者448例(无LASEC组)。结果 LASEC组持续性AF比例高于无LASEC组(36.7%比27.0%,P=0.025),左心房(LA)内径大于无LASEC组[(41.4±4.7)mm比(36.8±4.9)mm,P<0.001]。两组术前应用新型口服抗凝药利伐沙班或达比加群酯比例比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。LASEC组术前抗凝时间长于无LASEC组[(17.2±11.2)d比(7.2±7.6)d,P<0.001],术中肝素用量大于无LASEC组[(8925.5±1532.2)U比(8010.2±1473.7)U,P=0.004],平均激活全血凝固时间(ACT)值大于无LASEC组[(333.0±31.3)s比(296.0±27.6)s,P=0.001]。两组围术期均无卒中及重要脏器出血发生。LASEC组及无LASEC组分别随访(8.9±2.7)个月及(9.7±2.8)个月,随访期间出血事件及血栓栓塞事件发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论对于接受AF导管消融的LASEC患者,围术期强化抗凝治疗安全有效。
关键词(KeyWords): 心房颤动;经食管超声心动图;自发性超声显影;导管消融
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0900904)
作者(Author): 孙鸣宇,王祖禄,梁明,杨桂棠,金志清,周薇薇,刘楠楠,韩雅玲
参考文献(References):
- [1] Burrell LD, Horne BD, Anderson JL, et al. Usefulness of left atrial appendage volume as a predictor of embolic stroke in patients with atrialfibrillation. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 112(8):1148-1152.
- [2] Black IW. Spontaneous echo contrast:where there's smoke there's fire. Echocardiography, 2000, 17(4):373-382.
- [3] Watanabe T, Shinoda Y, Ikeoka K, et al. Dabigatran exhibits low intensity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fbrillation as compared with warfarin. Heart Vessels, 2017, 32(3):326-332.
- [4] Qamruddin S, Shinbane J, Shriki J, et al. Left atrial appendage:structure,function,imaging modalities and therapeutic options.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2010,8(1):65-75.
- [5] Donal E,Yamada H,Leclercq C,et al. The left atrial appendage,a small,blind-ended structure:a review of its echocardiographic evaluation and its clinical role. Chest,2005,128(3):1853-1862.
- [6]熊婧,陈维.经皮左心耳封堵术研究回顾与展望.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2018, 26(10):589-592.
- [7]姚青,宋治远,郭燕丽,等.经皮左心耳封堵术在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的应用——单中心经验.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2018, 26(10):553-558.
- [8] Fatkin D, Kell RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardial, 1994,23(4):961-969.
- [9]张运,张梅,葛志明.介入性超声心动图学.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:477-480.
- [10] Bernhardt P, Sehmidt H, Harnmerstingl C, et al. Patients with atrial fibrillation and dense spontaneous echo contrast at high risk a prospective and serial follow-up over 12 months with transesophageal echocardiography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 45(11):1807-1812.
- [11] Jaber WA, White RD, Kuzmiak SA, et al. Comparison of ability to identify left atrial thrombus by three-dimensional tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 93(4):486-489.
- [12] Pollick C, Taylor D. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for the development of thrombus. Circulation, 1991,84(1):223-231.
- [13] Leung DY, Black IW, Cranney GB, et al. Prognostic implications of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994, 24(3):755-762.
- [14] Taguchi Y, Takashima S, Hirai T, et al. Significant impairment of left atrial function in patients with cardioembolic stroke caused by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Intern Med, 2010, 49(16):1727-1732.
- [15] Chiang CE, Okumura K, Zhang S, et al. 2017 consensus of the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Arrhythm, 2017, 33(4):345-367.