经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞合并左心室射血分数降低患者的远期疗效Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with chronic total occlusion and low left ventricular ejection fraction
朱伯达,赵帅,汪钦,王伟,郭梦珂,杨茂森,沙治霖,申安心,徐绥宁,陈根锐,谭志军,文亮,杨丽,高好考,廉坤,李成祥
摘要(Abstract):
目的 评价冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞(CTO)病变合并左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后的远期疗效。方法 连续纳入2012年1月至2018年2月在中国人民解放军空军军医大学第一附属医院接受择期PCI的CTO病变患者,根据LVEF将其分为A组(LVEF≥50%)、B组(50%>LVEF≥40%)、C组(LVEF<40%)。收集详细的基线资料、术中数据和长期随访资料,分析CTO病变合并LVEF降低的患者行PCI的远期疗效和风险预测因子。结果共1197例CTO-PCI患者,平均年龄(61.92±10.71)岁,男性占84.21%。根据基线LVEF,将研究人群分为3组:A组682例(56.98%),B组268例(22.39%),C组247例(20.63%)。C组患者卒中(9.72%比4.11%,P=0.010)、高尿酸血症(26.72%比9.09%,P=0.002)、慢性肾病(5.26%比1.47%,P=0.012)、既往心肌梗死(29.55%比11.88%,P<0.001)均显著高于A组患者,差异均有统计学意义。C组34.01%患者有严重的呼吸困难(纽约心脏病协会心功能分级Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)。C组比A组与B组支架数量和手术时间均有轻微增加[(2.10±2.17)枚比(1.83±1.85)枚比(1.78±1.84)枚,P=0.398;(104.60±49.31)min比(96.96±51.27)min比(101.67±54.73)min,P=0.178],差异均无统计学意义,但其手术成功率明显低于A组与B组(84.21%比93.84%比94.03%,P<0.001)。成功随访1029例(85.96%)CTO病变患者,平均随访时间为(44.82±22.89)个月。C组主要不良心血管事件发生率和全因死亡率明显高于A组与B组(30.88%比16.48%比22.61%;28.57%比11.09%比16.58%,均P<0.001)。多因素Cox分析发现,糖尿病(HR 1.923,95%CI 1.273~2.904,P=0.002)和LVEF<40%(HR 3.178,95%CI 1.950~5.181,P<0.001)是患者全因死亡的独立危险因素。结论 PCI是CTO病变合并LVEF降低患者一种有效的血运重建治疗策略,可以显著改善其心功能,获得良好的远期疗效。
关键词(KeyWords): 慢性完全闭塞;心力衰竭;预后;风险预测因子
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 朱伯达,赵帅,汪钦,王伟,郭梦珂,杨茂森,沙治霖,申安心,徐绥宁,陈根锐,谭志军,文亮,杨丽,高好考,廉坤,李成祥
参考文献(References):
- [1] Tajstra M, Pyka?,Gorol J, et al. Impact of chronic total occlusion of the coronary artery on long-term prognosis in patients with ischemic systolic heart failure:insights from the COMMIT-HF Registry[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2016, 9(17):1790-1797.
- [2] Mashayekhi K, Nührenberg TG, Toma A,et al. A randomized trial to assess regional left ventricular function after stent implantation in chronic total occlusion:the REVASC trial[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(19):1982-1991.
- [3] Elias J, van Dongen IM, R?munddal T, et al. Long-term impact of chronic total occlusion recanalisation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Heart, 2018, 104(17):1432-1438.
- [4] Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM,et al. Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion[J]. Circulation, 2019, 139(14):1674-1683.
- [5] Megaly M, Saad M, Tajti P,et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricular systolic function and reverse remodeling[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2018, 31(5):562-571.
- [6] Khariton Y, Airhart S, Salisbury AC, et al. Health status benefi ts of successful chronic total occlusion revascularization across the spectrum of left ventricular function:insights from the OPEN-CTO Registry[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2018, 11(22):2276-2283.
- [7] Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Elias J, et al. Meta-analysis on the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on left ventricular function and clinical outcome[J].Int J Cardiol, 2015, 187:90-96.
- [8] Ma Y, Li D, Li J,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for patients with chronic total occlusion:a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(5):2960-2967.
- [9] Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al.A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(26):2484-2493.
- [10] Mamas MA, Anderson SG, O’Kane PD, et al. Impact of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention:insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35(43):3004-3012a.
- [11] Wallace TW, Berger JS, Wang A, et al. Impact of left ventricular dysfunction on hospital mortality among patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Am J Cardiol, 2009, 103(3):355-360.
- [12] Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 10(21):2158-2170.
- [13] Toma A, St?hli BE, Gick M, et al.Comparison of benefi t of successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in patients with versus without reduced(≤40%) left ventricular ejection fraction[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2017, 120(10):1780-1786.
- [14] Brilakis ES, Mashayekhi K, Tsuchikane E, et al. Guiding principles for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2019, 140(5):420-433.
- [15] Harding SA, Wu EB, Lo S,et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the asia pacific chronic total occlusion club[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 10(21):2135-2143.
- [16] Wyman RM. Antegrade dissection and reentry:tools and techniques[J]. Interv Cardiol Clin, 2021, 10(1):41-50.
- [17] Grantham JA, Jones PG, Cannon L, et al. Quantifying the early health status benefi ts of successful chronic total occlusion recanalization:results from the FlowCardia’s Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization(FACTOR)Trial[J].Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2010, 3(3):284-290.
- [18] Chi WK, Gong M, Bazoukis G, et al. Impact of coronary artery chronic total occlusion on arrhythmic and mortality outcomes:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 2018, 4(9):1214-1223.
- [19] van Dongen IM, Yilmaz D, Elias J, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a chronic total coronary occlusion on ventricular arrhythmias and long-term mortality in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator(the eCTOpy-in-ICD Study)[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2018, 7(10):e008609.
- [20] Godino C, Giannattasio A, Scotti A, et al. Risk of cardiac and sudden death with and without revascularisation of a coronary chronic total occlusion[J]. Heart, 2019, 105(14):1096-1102.
- [21] Adachi Y, Sakakura K, Wada H, et al. Determinants of left ventricular systolic function improvement following coronary artery revascularization in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction(HFr EF)[J]. Int Heart J, 2016, 57(5):565-572.
- [22] Kim GS, Kim BK, Shin DH,et al. Predictors of poor clinical outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion intervention with drugeluting stents[J]. Coron Artery Dis, 2017, 28(5):381-386.
- [23] Migliorini A, Moschi G, Vergara R, et al. Drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusion[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2006, 67(3):344-348.
- [24] Borghi C, Palazzuoli A, Landolfo M, et al. Hyperuricemia:a novel old disorder-relationship and potential mechanisms in heart failure[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 2020, 25(1):43-51.
- [25] Bell DSH, Goncalves E. Heart failure in the patient with diabetes:Epidemiology, aetiology, prognosis, therapy and the ef fect of glucose-lowering medications[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2019, 21(6):1277-1290.
- [26] Farooq V, Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. The negative impact of incomplete angiographic revascularization on clinical outcomes and its association with total occlusions:the SYNTAX(Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery)trial[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(3):282-294.
- [27] Pyka?,Hawranek M, Tajstra M,et al. Complete percutaneous revascularisation feasibility in ischaemic heart failure is related to improved outcomes:insights from the COMMIT-HF registry[J].Kardiol Pol, 2017, 75(5):453-461.