早期及晚期远程缺血预适应对不稳定型心绞痛经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的不同影响The different impact between late-phase of limb ischemia preconditioning and early-phase on patients with percutaneous coronary intervention
梁家荣,唐良秋,陈云宪,张社兵,范文茂,陈宝峰,陈锦峰,刘相应,侯进辉
摘要(Abstract):
目的研究早期及晚期远程缺血预适应对不稳定型心绞痛经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的不同影响。方法连续入选2014年1月至2016年1月于粤北人民医院择期行PCI术不稳定型心绞痛患者160例,其中晚期远程缺血预适应组(80例)PCI术前3 d开始行右上肢缺血预适应,用血压计袖带压迫肱动脉。将血压计加压至200 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 k Pa),持续5 min后放气休息,间隔5 min,重复3次,共耗时30 min;早期远程缺血预适应组(80例)PCI术前2 h开始行上述方法。比较PCI术中参数及术后24 h心肌肌钙蛋白T(c TNT)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平及12个月不良事件发生率。结果所有患者均顺利完成PCI,术中无心肺复苏、电除颤、心源性休克等情况发生。晚期远程缺血预适应组术中胸痛[2.50%(2/80)比8.75%(7/80),P=0.018]、术中心律失常[0(0/80)比5.00%(4/80),P<0.001]、术后即刻TIMI血流≤Ⅱ级[1.25%(1/80)比6.25%(5/80),P=0.024]发生率均显著低于早期远程缺血预适应组,差异均有统计学意义。晚期远程缺血预适应组术后24 h cTnT[(11.52±2.41)pg/ml比(27.53±4.78)pg/ml,P=0.021]、CK-MB[(14.11±2.87)pg/ml比(30.23±5.17)pg/ml,P=0.032]均较早期远程缺血预适应组下降,差异均有统计学意义。两组术后24 h hs-CRP比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.742)。K-M生存曲线显示,晚期远程缺血预适应组较早期远程缺血预适应组终点事件发生率明显下降(3.75%比13.75%),经Breslow检验P=0.024,提示两组生存率差异有统计学意义。结论晚期远程缺血预适应比早期远程缺血预适应对不稳定型心绞痛PCI术患者有更强大的心肌保护作用,并改善患者术后12个月预后。
关键词(KeyWords): 晚期远程缺血预适应;早期远程缺血预适应;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;肌钙蛋白T;预后
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 梁家荣,唐良秋,陈云宪,张社兵,范文茂,陈宝峰,陈锦峰,刘相应,侯进辉
参考文献(References):
- [1]Przyklenk K,Bauer B,Ovize M,et al.Regional ischemic'preconditioning'protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion.Circulation,1993,87(3):893-899.
- [2]Kharbanda RK,Mortensen UM,White PA,et al.Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo.Circulation,2002,106(23):2881-2883.
- [3]Kharbanda RK,Li J,Konstantinov IE,et al.Remote ischaemic preconditioning protects against cardiopulmonary bypass-induced tissue injury:a preclinical study.Heart,2006,92(10):1506-1511.
- [4]Mc Cafferty K,Forbes S,Thiemermann C,et al.The challenge of translating ischemic conditioning from animal models to humans:the role of comorbidities.Dis Model Mech,2014,7(12):1321-1333.
- [5]B?tker HE,Kharbanda R,Schmidt MR,et al.Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission,as a complement to angioplasty,and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction:a randomised trial.Lancet,2010,375(9716):727-734.
- [6]雒生杰,周玉杰,贾德安,等.远程缺血预适应对冠心病支架治疗患者的心肌保护作用.中国循证心血管医学杂志,2016,8(7):808-811.
- [7]Konstantinov IE,Arab S,Kharbanda RK,et al.The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans.Physiol Genomics,2004,19(1):143-150.
- [8]Murry CE,Jennings RB,Reimer KA.Preconditioning with ischemia:a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium.Circulation,1986,74(5):1124-1136.
- [9]Hoole SP,Heck PM,Sharples L,et al.Cardiac remote ischemic preconditioning in coronary stenting(CRISP Stent)Study:a prospective,randomized control trial.Circulation,2009,119(6):820-827.
- [10]Eitel I,Stiermaier T,Rommel KP,et al.Cardioprotection by combined intrahospital remote ischaemic perconditioning and postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction:the randomized LIPSIA CONDITIONING trial.Eur Heart J,2015,36(44):3049-3057.
- [11]Crimi G,Pica S,Raineri C,et al.Remote ischemic postconditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction:a randomized controlled trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6(10):1055-1063.
- [12]万晶晶,刘承云,成蓓.缺血预适应研究现状及展望.心脏杂志,2006,18(4):465-471.
- [13]程中伟,吕伟华,程康安,等.缺血预适应改善急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的预后.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2010,18(6):309-312.
- [14]王艳玲,华琦,刘志,等.晚期时相肢体缺血预适应对冠状动脉介入术患者的预后影响.首都医科大学学报,2015,36(3):393-398.
- [15]Porto I,Blackman DJ,Nicolson D,et al.What is the incidence of myocardial necrosis in elective patients discharged on the same day following percutaneous coronary intervention?Heart,2004,90(12):1489-1490.
- [16]Nageh T,Sherwood RA,Harris BM,et al.Cardiac troponin T and I and creatine kinase-MB as markers of myocardial injury and predictors of outcome following percutaneous coronary intervention.Int J Cardiol,2003,92(2-3):285-293.
- [17]Feldman DN,Kim L,Rene AG,et al.Prognostic value of cardiac troponin-I or troponin-T elevation following nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention:a meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2011,77(7):1020-1030.