美国心血管造影和介入学会关于心原性休克新的分类及意义
赵汉军,颜红兵
摘要(Abstract):
<正>2019年5月,美国心血管造影和介入学会(Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,SCAI)在拉斯维加斯召开的第42届年会上公布了《心原性休克分类的临床专家共识声明》,并于7月发表于Catheter Cardiovasc Interv杂志[1]。该共识同时得到了美国心脏病学会(American College of Cardiology,ACC)、美国心脏协会(American Heart Association,AHA)、美国重症医学会(Society of Critical Care Medicine,SCCM)和美国胸外科医师学会(Society of Thoracic Surgeons,STS)的认可。SCAI心原性休克(cardiogenic shock,CS)分类分为A、B、C、D、E 5个阶段,分别为风险期(at risk)、开始期(beginning)、典型期(classic)、
关键词(KeyWords): 心原性休克;心力衰竭;美国心血管造影和介入学会
基金项目(Foundation): 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(2016-I2M-1-009)
作者(Author): 赵汉军,颜红兵
参考文献(References):
- [1] Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock:This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology(ACC), the American Heart Association(AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine(SCCM),and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons(STS)in April 2019.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2019,94(1):29-37.
- [2] O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 61(4):e78-e140.
- [3] Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med,1999, 341(9):625-634.
- [4] Ouweneel DM, Eriksen E, Sjauw KD, et al. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 69(3):278-287.
- [5]颜红兵,陈韵岱,郭静萱.努力降低心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的死亡率.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2018, 26(2):61-62.
- [6] Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(14):1287-1296.
- [7] Shah M, Patnaik S, Patel B, et al. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Clin Res Cardiol,2018, 107(4):287-303.
- [8] Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock:a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30(17):2102-2108.
- [9] Aso S, Matsui H, Fushimi K, et al. The Effect of intraaortic balloon pumping under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality of cardiogenic patients:an analysis using a nationwide inpatient database. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44(11):1974-1979.
- [10] Abdel-Wahab M, Saad M, Kynast J, et al. Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol,2010, 105(7):967-971.
- [11] Davierwala PM, Leontyev S, Verevkin A, et al. Temporal trends in predictors of early and late mortality after emergency coronary artery bypass grafting for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. circulation, 2016, 134(17):1224-1237.
- [12] Basir Mb, Schreiber Tl, Grines Cl, et al. Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock.Am J Cardiol,2017, 119(6):845-851.
- [13] Huang CC, Hsu JC, Wu YW, et al. Implementation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve the survival of patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock. Int J Cardiol,2018, 269:45-50.