直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术前、术后血清心型脂肪酸结合蛋白水平与急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者预后的相关性Relationship between serum heart-type fatty acid binding protein levels before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
刘相应,唐良秋,范文茂,张社兵,陈锦锋,梁家荣,陈云宪,陈兆基
摘要(Abstract):
目的观察直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)术前、术后血清心型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)水平与急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者术后6个月预后的相关性。方法连续选取粤北人民医院2014年11月至2015年5月STEMI患者共77例,均于发病12 h内行pPCI术,于pPCI术前5 min内及发病后24 h检测血清H-FABP浓度。记录患者一般信息、相关检查化验结果、手术相关情况、心血管疾病危险因素等,随访术后6个月内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生情况。结果(1)Pearson相关分析显示:术前血清H-FABP浓度与STEMI患者冠状动脉病变Gensini积分呈正相关(r=0.753,P<0.01);术后血清H-FABP浓度与Gensini积分亦呈正相关(r=0.388,P<0.05),但相关性较差;术前血清H-FABP浓度与STEMI患者心肌梗死范围(MIA)呈正相关(r=0.792,P<0.01);术后血清H-FABP浓度与STEMI患者MIA亦呈正相关(r=0.296,P<0.01),但相关性欠佳。(2)术前以血清H-FABP浓度=106.35 ng/ml为最佳临界值,预测STEMI患者行pPCI术后6个月内发生MACE的敏感度为92.0%,特异度为80.1%,ROC曲线下面积为0.901(95%CI 0.830~0.973,P<0.01)。术后以血清H-FABP浓度=31.85 ng/ml为最佳临界值,预测STEMI患者行pPCI术后6个月内发生MACE的敏感度为88.4%,特异度为52.6%,ROC曲线下面积为0.734(95%CI 0.618~0.851,P=0.002)。(3)随访6个月,共20例患者发生MACE。单因素Cox回归模型发现,术前血清H-FABP浓度(P<0.01)、术后血清H-FABP浓度(P=0.04)均为STEMI患者行pPCI术后6个月内发生MACE的危险因素。多因素Cox回归模型发现,术前血清H-FABP浓度(P=0.008)、糖尿病史(P=0.038)、心肌肌钙蛋白I峰值(P=0.006)、氨基末端B型脑钠肽前体(P=0.021)为STEMI患者行pPCI术后6个月内发生MACE的主要危险因素。结论对于行pPCI的STEMI患者,术前血清H-FABP浓度可能是其术后6个月内发生MACE的独立危险因素。
关键词(KeyWords): 心型脂肪酸结合蛋白;急性心肌梗死;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;危险因素;预后
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 刘相应,唐良秋,范文茂,张社兵,陈锦锋,梁家荣,陈云宪,陈兆基
参考文献(References):
- [1]O'donoghue M,De Lemos JA,Morrow DA,et al.Prognostic utility of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes.Circulation,2006,114(6):550-557.
- [2]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2015,43(5):380-393.
- [3]邹古明,颜红兵.造影剂肾病的诊断与治疗现状.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2005,13(3):194-196.
- [4]于立峰,李敬田,杨建美.心型脂肪酸结合蛋白在冠心病患者行PCI治疗前后的变化及意义.山东医药,2011,51(17):100-101.
- [5]Ozdemir L,Elonu OH,Gocmen AY.Heart type fatty acid binding protein is more sensitive than troponin I and creatine kinase myocardial band at early stage in determining myocardial injury caused by percutaneous coronary intervention.Int Heart J,2011,52(3):143-145.
- [6]De Lemos JA,Antman EM,Morrow DA,et al.Heart-type fatty acid binding protein as a marker of reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy.Clin Chim Acta,2000,298(1-2):85-97.
- [7]Kitamura M,Hata N,Takayama T,et al.Different characteristics of cardiac biomarkers to decide and predict the culprit lesions in patients with suspicious acute coronary syndrome.Heart Vessels,2016,31(6):907-917.
- [8]王东生,郭明海,褚军华.直接PCI后即刻心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白与梗死心肌面积相关性研究.航空航天医学杂志,2009,20(10):12-14.
- [9]Bertinchant JP,Polge A.Diagnostic and prognostic value of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein(H-FABP),an early biochemical marker of myocardial injury.Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss,2005,98(12):1225-1231.
- [10]Aartsen WM,Pelsers MM,Hermens WT,et al.Heart fatty acid binding protein and cardiac troponin T plasma concentrations as markers for myocardial infarction after coronary artery ligation in mice.Pflugers Arch,2000,439(4):416-422.
- [11]Matsumoto S,Nakatani D,Sakata Y,et al.Elevated serum heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in the convalescent stage predicts long-term outcome in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction.Circ J,2013,77(4):1026-1032.
- [12]高灵,孟照辉.冠状动脉评分方法的研究进展.医学综述,2013,19(9):1601-1603.
- [13]姚竞,沈晓柔.急性心肌梗死早期ST段预测梗死面积的意义.中国临床医学,2002,9(4):351-352.
- [14]Garcia-Valdecasas S,Ruiz-Alvarez MJ,Garcia De Tena J,et al.Diagnostic and prognostic value of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein in the early hours of acute myocardial infarction.Acta Cardiol,2011,66(3):315-321.