西罗莫司洗脱支架和Pixel支架治疗冠状动脉小血管病变的比较Comparative study of clinical and angiographic follow-up of sirolimus-eluting stent and Pixel stent for treatment of coronary small vessel disease
刘幼文,刘强,潘楚梅,金光临,罗剑峰,艾淑智,王凤山
摘要(Abstract)：
目的对比研究西罗莫司洗脱支架(CypherTM支架)和Pixel支架治疗冠状动脉小血管病变的安全性及疗效。方法将2003年3月至2005年1月在我院住院的67例小血管病变患者随机分成A、B两组,A组34例接受CypherTM支架治疗,B组33例接受Pixel支架治疗。比较分析两组的手术成功率、并发症发生率、心脏不良事件发生率、再狭窄率及晚期管腔丢失等指标。结果两组支架置入术的成功率均为100%,无残余狭窄或残余狭窄<10%,无任何并发症。A组有30例、B组有29例患者在术后约9个月复查了定量冠状动脉造影。随访期间,A组中有2例出现支架内再狭窄导致临床心绞痛复发;B组有7例复发心绞痛,其中6例经冠状动脉造影证实为支架内再狭窄所致;两组均无一例死亡。A组的造影再狭窄率为6.7%,B组为20.7%(P<0.05);A组的晚期管腔丢失为0.19±0.58mm,B组为0.63±0.61mm(P<0.01);A组的靶血管再次血运重建率为6.7%,B组为20.7%(P<0.05)。结论CypherTM支架和Pixel支架治疗小血管病变均安全、有效,但CypherTM支架的远期疗效明显优于Pixel支架。
关键词(KeyWords)： 支架;冠状动脉疾病;西罗莫司
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 刘幼文,刘强,潘楚梅,金光临,罗剑峰,艾淑智,王凤山
参考文献(References)：
- 1RoguinA,BeyarR.Smallvesselstentingissafe,butstillwaitingfora well provenantirestenoticeffect.EurHeartJ,2000,21:17321734.
- 2CasellaG,PratiF.Stentingsmallcoronaryarteries:TheMulti Link PixelMulticenterItalianRegistry.JInvasiveCardiol,2003,15:377386.
- 3DegertekinM,SerruysPW,FoleyDP,etal.Persistentinhibitionof neointimalhyperplasiaaftersirolimus elutingstentimplantation:long term(upto2years)clinical,angiographicandintravascularultrasound follow up.Circulation,2002,106:16101613.
- 4SchampaertE,CohenEA,SchluterM,etal.TheCanadianstudyof thesirolimus elutingstentinthetreatmentofpatientswithlongdenovo lesionsinsmallnativecoronaryarteries(C SIRIUS).JAmColl Cardiol,2004,43:11161123.
- 5SavageMP,FishmanDL,RakeL,etal.Efficacyofcoronarystenting versusballoonangioplastyinsmallcoronaryarteries:Thestent restenosisstudy(STRESS)investigators.JAmCollCardiol,1998,31:307310.
- 6FoleyJB.Alterationsinreferencevesseldiameterfollowing intracoronarystentimplantation:importantconsequencesforrestenosis basedonpercentdiameterstenosis.CathetCardiovascDiagn,1995,35:103.
- 7KobayashiY,DeGregorioJ,ReimersB,etal.Thelengthofthe stentedsegmentisanindependentpredictorofrestenosis.JAmColl Cardiol,1998,33(SuppleA):366A.