徐盛开,江洪,宁金民,伏静媛

• 1: 兰州市第一人民医院心内科
• 2:武汉大学人民医院心内科
• 3:兰州市第一人民医院心内科
• 4:兰州市第一人民医院心内科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的比较尿激酶静脉溶栓联合冠状动脉(冠脉)介入治疗(PCI)术与直接PCI术对急性心肌梗死(AMI)的有效性和安全性。方法64例首次ST段抬高AMI(STelevationmyocarialinfarc-tion,STEMI)患者随机分为直接PCI组(直接PCI治疗)和联合PCI组(在尿激酶静脉溶栓基础上联合直接PCI治疗)。PCI术治疗前后行冠脉造影、心电图检查,观察梗死相关血管(IRA)前向血流,测定心肌梗死溶栓治疗临床试验(TIMI)血流、TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG),计算冠脉造影灌注积分(APS)和心电图ST段回落程度,评估心外膜血管和心肌灌注情况,对两组患者介入术前IRA通畅率、住院期间出血并发症、急性缺血事件发生率及出院前左心室功能进行比较。用线性回归分析评价ST段回落程度与APS的相关性。结果PCI术前联合PCI组冠脉再通率显著高于直接PCI组(68.8%比37.6%,P<0.05),其中完全再通率在两组间比较差异有统计学意义(46.9%比21.9%,P<0.05);联合PCI组心肌再灌注率显著高于直接PCI组(71.9%比37.4%,P<0.01),其中完全心肌再灌注率在两组间比较差异有统计学意义(46.9%比21.9%,P<0.05)。PCI术后两组IRA的TIMI血流3级比较差异无统计学意义(90.6%比87.5%,P>0.05),但比较TMPG差异有统计学意义(93.8%比75.0%,P<0.05),其中TMP3级有明显差异(65.6%比37.5%,P<0.05);联合PCI组APS10~12分(心肌完全再灌注)与直接PCI组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。介入治疗后出院前联合PCI组的LVEF值明显大于直接PCI组。联合PCI组ST段完全回落比例明显高于直接PCI组。线性回归分析评价ST段回落程度与APS之间有显著相关性(相关系数r=0.961,P<0.001),住院期间两组均无死亡病例、严重出血及急性缺血事件发生。结论联合PCI术较直接PCI术可获得更好的IRA开通、心肌组织和微循环灌注及心功能的明显改善。APS结合TIMI血流分级和TMPG可较好地完整评价心外膜血管和心肌灌注情况,并与心电图ST段回落程度有显著相关性。

关键词(KeyWords)： 心肌梗死;血管成形术,经腔,经皮冠状动脉;溶栓治疗;冠状血管造影术

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 徐盛开,江洪,宁金民,伏静媛

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Ribichini F,Wijns W.Acute myocardial infarction:reperfusion treatment.Heart,2002,88:298-305.
• [2]Li RH,Herrmann HC.Facilitated percutaneous coronary interven-tion:a novel concept in expediting and improving acute myocardial infarction care.Am Heart J,2000,140:S125-135.
• [3]The TIMI Study Group.The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)trial.NEngl J Med,1985,31:932-936.
• [4]Gibson CM,Cannon CP,Murphy SA,et al.Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of throm-bolytic drugs.Circulation,2000,101:125-130.
• [5]Gibson CM,Murphy SA,Morrow DA,et al.Angiographic perfusion score:An angiographic variable that integrates both epicardial andti-ssue level perfusion before and after facilitated percutaneous coronary interventionin acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J,2004,148:336-340.
• [6]Feldman LJ,Coste P,Furber A,et al.Incomplete resolution of ST-Segment elevationis a marker of transient microcirculatory dysfunction after stentingfor acute myocardial infarction.Circulation,2003,107:2684-2689.
• [7]Velianou JL,Wilson SH,Reeder GS,et al.Decreasing mortality with primary percutaneous coronaryinterventionin patients with acute myocardial infarction:the Mayo Clinic experience from1991through1997.Mayo Clin Proc,2000,75:994-1001.
• [8]Cannon CP,Antman EM,Walls R,et al.Time as an Adjunctive Agent to Thrombolytic Therapy.J Thromb Thrombolysis,1994,1:27-34.
• [9]Rawles J,GREAT.GREAT:10year survival of patients with sus-pected acute myocardial infarctionin a randomised comparison of pre-hospital and hospital thrombolysis.Heart,2003,89:563-564.
• [10]Murphy SA,Dauterman K,de Lemos JA,et al.Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated withthe development of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)14trial.Am Heart J,2003,146:42-47.
• [11]Herrmann HC,Moliterno DJ,Ohman EM,et al.Facilitation of early percutaneous coronaryintervention after reteplase with or without ab-ciximab in acute myocardial infarction:results from the SPEED(GUSTO-4Pilot)Trial.J AmColl Cardiol,2000,36:1489-1496.
• [12]Brener SJ,Zeymer U,Adgey AA,et al.Eptifibatide and low-dose tissue plasminogen activator in actue myocardial infarction:the inte-grilin and low-dose thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction(IN-TRO AMI)trial.J AmColl Cardiol,2002,39:377-386.
• [13]Brodie BR.Primary percutaneous coronary intervention at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery:expanding the use of mechanical reperfusionfor acute myocardial infarction.J AmColl Cardiol,2004,43:1951-1953.
• [14]Stone GW,Peterson MA,Lansky AJ.Impact of normalized myocar-dial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarc-tion.J AmColl Cardiol,2002,39:591-597.
• [15]Dibra A,Mehilli J,Dirschinger J.Thrombolysis in myocardial in-farction myocardial perfusion grade in angiography correlates with myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarctiontreated with stentingorthrombolysis.J AmColl Cardiol,2003,41:925-929.
• [16]Haager PK,Christott P,Heussen N.Prediction of clinical outcome after mechanical revascularization in acute myocardial infarction by markers of myocardial reperfusion.J AmColl Cardiol,2003,41:532-538.
• [17]Poli A,Fetiveau R,Vandoni P.Integrated analysis of myocardial blush and ST-segment elevation recovery after successful primary an-gioplasty:real-time grading of microvascular reperfusion and predic-tion of early and late recovery of left ventricular function.Circula-tion,2002,106:313-318.
• [18]Vaitkus PT,Laskey WK.Efficacy of adjunctive thrombolytic therapy in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.J Am Coll Cardi-ol,1994,24:1415-1423.
• [19]Ellis SG,Armstrong P,Betriu A,et al.Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary interven-tion:design andrationale of thefacilitatedintervention withenhanced reperfusion speed to stop events(FINESSE)trial.Am Heart J,2004,147:E16.