急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔介入封堵与外科手术治疗临床对比Clinical comparison of interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular septal rupture
王学文,钟建利,鄢华,蔡建华,宋丹,苏晞
摘要(Abstract):
目的比较介入封堵及外科手术治疗两种方法在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔(PIVSR)患者中应用的效果,探索最佳治疗方法及手术时机。方法回顾2012年1月至2018年12月武汉亚洲心脏病医院PI-VSR的患者资料,分析介入封堵与外科手术治疗的疗效。结果共纳入PI-VSR患者66例,其中18例为介入封堵组,2例因位置或破口面积太大不适合封堵,改行外科手术;22例为外科手术组;26例为药物治疗组。66例患者平均年龄(66.48±9.91)岁,其中男37例(57.8%),女29例(42.2%)。造影提示:左前降支闭塞58例,右冠状动脉闭塞8例。介入封堵组与外科手术组比较:术后穿孔大小[(0.4±0.1)cm比(0.5±0.2)cm,P=0.816];穿孔至手术时间[(20.8±5.4)d比(29.9±4.9)d,P=0.524],急性心肌梗死(AMI)至手术时间[(20.4±5.0)d比(31.6±4.8)d,P=0.061],入院至手术时间[(16.4±5.1)d比(18.6±1.6)d,P=0.675],术后住院时间[(10.8±7.9)d比(16.6±2.7)d,P=0.653];主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)使用率(50.0%比68.2%,P=0.135),IABP使用时间[(7.1±7.3)d比(12.9±2.7)d,P<0.001]。术前左心室射血分数(LVEF)[(41.2±5.6)%比(41.9±5.0)%,P=0.002],术后LVEF[(45.6±4.4)%比(42.2±6.5)%,P=0.264]。介入封堵组患者与药物治疗组患者有效率比较(88.9%比7.7%,P<0.001),外科手术组患者与药物治疗组患者有效率比较(86.4%比7.7%,P<0.001),差异均有统计学意义;但是介入封堵组患者与外科手术组患者有效率比较(88.9%比86.4%,P=0.598),差异无统计学意义。结论介入封堵治疗与外科手术治疗相比,介入封堵治疗PI-VSR是安全、有效的,创伤较小,住院时间明显减少。药物治疗效果较差。因此,积极的介入封堵治疗或者外科手术治疗,可降低死亡率,改善预后。
关键词(KeyWords): 急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔;介入封堵治疗;外科手术;室间隔封堵
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 王学文,钟建利,鄢华,蔡建华,宋丹,苏晞
参考文献(References):
- [1] Moreyra AE,Huang MS,Wilson AC,et al.Trends in incidence and mortality rates of ventricular septal rupture during acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2010,106(8):1095-1100.
- [2] Yip HK,Wu CJ,Chang HW,et a1.Cardiac rupture complicating acute myocaldial infarction in the direct percutaneous coronary intervention reperfusion era.Chest,2003,124(2):565-571.
- [3] Crenshaw BS,Gmnger CB,Bimbaum Y,et al.Risk factors,angiographic patterns,and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction.GUSTO-I(global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries)Trial investigators.Circulation, 2000,101(1):27-32.
- [4] Deja MA,Szostek J,Widenka K,et al. Post infarction ventricular septal defect-can we do better? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2000,18(2):194-201.
- [5] Madsen JC,Daggett WM. Repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defects. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,1998,10(2):117-127.
- [6] Xu XD,Liu SX,Liu X,et al.Percutaneous closure of postinfarct muscular ventricular septal defects:a multicenter study in China.J Cardiol,2014,64(4):285-289.
- [7] Menon V,Webb JG,Hillis LD,et al. Outcome and profile of ventricular septal nlpture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction:a report from the SHOCK trial registry.Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries in cardiogenic shock?J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36(3 Suppl A):1110-1116.
- [8] Ozkara A,Cetin G,Mert M,et al. Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture:surgical intervention and risk factors influencing hospital mortality. Acta Cardiol,2005,60(2):213-217.
- [9]李国庆,吕继,郭自同,等.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔部位形态学特征及介入封堵术疗效观察.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2019, 27(6):322-327.
- [10]依力哈木·阿不力提甫,古孜丽,李国庆,等.急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔及室壁瘤形成患者的临床特点及预后分析.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(12):699-702.
- [11]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志,2010,38(8):675-690.
- [12]陈在嘉,高润霖.冠心病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:11.
- [13] Ryan TJ,Antman EM,Brooks NH,et al.1999 update:ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines(Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction).J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34(3):890-911.
- [14]胡小莹,邱洪,乔树宾,等.急性心肌梗死合并室问隔穿孔的近期预后因素分.中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(3):195-198.
- [15]甘辉立,张健群,陈宝田,等.心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔的外科治疗.中华外科杂志,2009,47(6):457-460.
- [16] Gray RJ,Sethna D,Matloff JM.The role of cardiac surgery in acute myocardial infarction Without mechanical complications.Am Heart J, 1983,106(4 Pt 1):728-735.
- [17] Vargas-Barron J,Molina-Carron M,Romem-Cardenas A,et al.Risk fators,echocardiographi patterns,and outcomes in patients with acute ventricular septal rupture during myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol,2005,95(10):1153-1158.
- [18] O`Gam PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD,et al.2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(4):e78-e140.
- [19]由巍,于波.急性心肌梗死合并室闯隔穿孔49例临床分析.内科急危重症杂志,2014,20(5):325-326.
- [20]孙勇,袁杰,张若溪,等.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔患者介入治疗的初步应用.中华心血管杂志,2009,37(11):1002-1005.
- [21] Attia R,Blauth C.Which patients might be suitable for a septal occluder device closure of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture rather than immediate surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2010,11(5):626-629.
- [22]杨舟,肖云彬,左超,等.介入封堵治疗室间隔缺损合并轻中度右冠状瓣脱垂的疗效观察.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2019,27(11):619-623.
- [23] Demkow M,Ruzyllo W, Kepka C, et al. Primary transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder-immediate results and up-to 5 years follow-up. Eurolntervention,2005,1(1):43-47.
- [24] Wilson WM, Horlick EM. Management of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture. Eurolntervention,2016,12Suppl X:X18-X23.
- [25] Calvert PA,Cockburn J,Wynne D,et al. Percutaneous closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defect:in-hospital outcomes and long-term follow-up of UK experience.Circulation,2014,129(23):2395-2402.