安梦楠,李悦,薛竟宜

• 1:哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院心血管内科

摘要(Abstract)：

<正>血流储备分数(fractional flow reserve, FFR)是目前国际公认的评价冠状动脉狭窄病变的功能学指标,即有狭窄病变的冠状动脉支配区域心肌最大血流量与同一冠状动脉无狭窄病变时心肌所能获得的最大血流量的比值,可简化为冠状动脉狭窄病变远端平均压力(Pd)和病变近端平均压力(Pa)的比值,即FFR值,其判断引起心肌缺血的界限值为0.80[1-3]。有临床研究证实,FFR值<0.80提示该病变需要血运重建,FFR值>0.80提示该病变引起心肌缺血的可能性很

关键词(KeyWords)： 血流储备分数;定量血流分数;瞬时无波形期跨病变压力比值

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 哈尔滨市应用技术研究与开发项目(2015 RAXYJ 056)

作者(Author): 安梦楠,李悦,薛竟宜

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Pijls NH,De Bruyne B,Peels K,et al.Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses.N Engl J Med,1996,334(26):1703-1708.
• [2]Pijls NH.Is it time to measure fractional fl ow reserve in all patients?J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41(7):1122-1124.
• [3]Montalescot G,Sechtem U,Achenbach S,et al.2013 ESCguidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur Heart J,2013,34(38):2949-3003.
• [4]Fearon WF,Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,et al.Rationale and design of the fractional fl ow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation(FAME)study.Am Heart J,2007,154(4):632-636.
• [5]Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional fl ow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.N Engl J Med,2009,360(3):213-224.
• [6]De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,Kalesan B,et al.Fractional fl ow reserveguided pci versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.NEngl J Med,2012,367(11):991-1001.
• [7]G?tberg M,Cook CM,Sen S,et al.The evolving future of instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve.J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(11):1379-1402.
• [8]Jeremias A,Kirtane AJ,Stone GW,et al.A test in context:fractional flow reserve:accuracy,prognostic implications,and limitations.J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,69(22):2748-2758.
• [9]G?tberg M,Christiansen EH,Gudmundsdottir IJ,et al.Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI.N Engl J Med,2017,376(19):1813-1823.
• [10]Ko BS,Cameron JD,Munnur RK,et al.Noninvasive CT-derived FFR based on structural and fluid analysis:a comparison with invasive FFR for detection of functionally significant stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2017,10(6):663-673.
• [11]Tu S,Barbato E,K?szegi Z,et al.Fractional fl ow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count a fast computer model to quantify the functional signifi cance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2014,7(7):768-777.
• [12]Matsuo H,Kawase Y.FFR and iFR guided percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2016,31(3):183-195.
• [13]Jeremias A,Maehara A,Généreux P,et al.Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional fl ow reserve:the RESOLVE study.JAm Coll Cardiol,2014,63(13):1253-1261.
• [14]Fede A,Zivelonghi C,Benfari G,et al.iFR-FFR comparison in daily practice:a single-center,prospective,online assessment.JCardiovasc Med(Hagerstown),2015,16(9):625-631.
• [15]Davies JE,Sen S,Dehbi HM,et al.Use of the instantaneous wavefree ratioor fractional fl ow reserve in PCI.N Engl J Med,2017,376(19):1824-1834.
• [16]熊玮珏,刘健.基于CT的无创血流储备分数研究进展.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(9):528-533.
• [17]N?rgaard BL,Leipsic J,Gaur S,et al.Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease:the NXT trial(analysis of coronary blood fl ow using ct angiography:next steps).J Am Coll Cardiol,2014,63(12):1145-1155.
• [18]Nakanishi R,Budoff MJ.Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease:technology and clinical update.Vasc Health Risk Manag,2016,12:269-278.
• [19]N?rgaard BL,Hjort J,Gaur S,et al.Clinical use of coronary CTA-derived FFR for decision-making in stable CAD.JACCCardiovasc Imaging,2017,10(5):541-550.
• [20]N?rgaard BL,Gaur S,Leipsic J,et al.Infl uence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease:a substudy of the NXTtrial.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2015,8(9):1045-1055.
• [21]Lu MT,Ferencik M,Roberts RS,et al.Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography:management and outcomes in the PROMISE trial.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2017,10(11):1350-1358.
• [22]Tu S,Huang Z,Koning G,et al.A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system:in-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2010,76(2):291-298.
• [23]Pellicano M,Lavi I,De Bruyne B,et al.Validation study of imagebased fractional flow reserve during coronary angiography.Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2017,10(9).pii:e005259.
• [24]Kornowski R,Vaknin-Assa H.Case report of fi rst angiographybased on-line FFR assessment duringcoronary catheterization.Case Rep Cardiol,2017:6107327.
• [25]Xu B,Tu S,Qiao S,et al.Angiography-based quantitative fl ow ratio for online assessment of coronary stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol,2017,70(25):3077-3087.
• [26]Westra J,Andersen BK,Campo G,et al.Diagnostic performance of in-procedure angiography-derived quantitative flow reserve compared to pressure-derived fractional fl ow reserve:the FAVORII Europe-Japan study.J Am Heart Assoc,2018,7(14).pii:e009603.