急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔介入封堵与药物治疗比较Comparison of interventional occlusion and drug therapy for acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular septal perforation
王学文,钟建利,鄢华,宋丹,蔡建华,苏晞
摘要(Abstract):
目的 比较介入封堵与药物治疗在急性心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔(PI-VSD)患者中的治疗效果及预后。方法 回顾2012年1月至2019年12月武汉亚洲心脏病医院心内科64例PI-VSD患者资料,比较两种治疗方式的治疗效果及患者预后。结果 患者平均年龄(66.5±9.9)岁,男36例(56.25%);其中38例行室间隔封堵治疗,3例因位置或破口面积太大不适合封堵,3例封堵后患者因心力衰竭死亡。38例造影结果提示:前降支病变29例(76.3%),右冠状动脉病变9例(23.7%);修复穿孔后残余漏(0.4±0.1)cm,术后左心室射血分数(45.6±4.4)%。药物治疗组主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)使用率低于介入封堵组(30.7%比63.2%,P=0.052),差异无统计学意义;IABP使用时间短于介入封堵组[(4.9±8.8)d比(10.5±11.1)d,P=0.038],差异有统计学意义。介入手术成功率84.2%(32/38),术后生存率91.4%(32/35),药物治疗生存率7.7%(2/26)。患者生存率相关因素分析提示:患者生存率与血流动力学是否稳定及是否行介入治疗有关,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论 PI-VSD介入封堵治疗是安全、有效的,创伤较小,介入封堵治疗效果较药物治疗更佳,降低了患者死亡率。
关键词(KeyWords): 急性心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔;介入治疗;药物治疗;介入封堵
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 王学文,钟建利,鄢华,宋丹,蔡建华,苏晞
参考文献(References):
- [1] Moreyra AE,Huang MS,Wilson AC,et a1.Trends in incidence and mortality rates of ventricular septal rupture during acute myocardial infarction[J].Am J Cardiol,2010,106(8):1095-1100.
- [2] Yip HK,Wu CJ,Chang HW,et a1.Cardiac rupture complicating acute myocaldial infarction in the direct percutaneous coronary intervention reperfusion era[J].Chest,2003,124(2):565-571.
- [3] Crenshaw BS,Gmnger CB,Bimbaum Y,et al.Risk factors,angiographic patterns,and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction.GUSTO-I(global utilization of streptokinase and TPA for occluded coronary arteries)Trial investigators[J].Circulation,2000,101(1):27-32.
- [4] Xu XD,Liu SX,Liu X,et a1.Percutaneous closure of postinfarct muscular ventricular septal defects:a multicenter study in China[J]. J Cardiol, 2014,64(4):285-289.
- [5] Menon V,Webb JG,Hillis LD,et al. Outcome and profile of ventricular septal nlpture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction:a report from the SHOCK trial registry.Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries in cardiogenic shock[J]?J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,36(3 Suppl 4):1110-1116.
- [6]李国庆,吕继,郭自同,等.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔部位形态学特征及介入封堵术疗效观察[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2019,(27)6:322-327.
- [7]依力哈木·阿不力提甫,古孜丽,李国庆,等.急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔及室壁瘤形成患者的临床特点及预后分析[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(12):699-702.
- [8]中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(10):766-783.
- [9] Gray RJ,Sethna D,Matlof f JM.The role of cardiac surgery in acute myocardial infarction without mechanical complications[J].Am Heart J,1983,106(4 Pt 1):728-735.
- [10]由巍,于波.急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔49例临床分析[J].内科急危重症杂志,2014,20(5):325-326.
- [11]孙勇,袁杰,张若溪,等.急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔患者介入治疗的初步应用[J].中华心血管病杂志,2009,37(11):1002-1005.
- [12] Attia R,Blauth C.Which patients might be suitable for a septal occluder device closure of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture rather than immediate surgery[J]? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg,2010,11(5):626-629.