经桡动脉急诊冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性与可行性A study on the feasibility and safety of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with transradial access in acute myocardial infarction patients
李为民,李悦,盛力,薛竞宜,杨树森,周立君,刘丕栋
摘要(Abstract)：
目的观察给急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者经桡动脉行急诊冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的安全性与可行性。方法选择2004年6月至2005年12月我院收治的289例临床诊断为AMI患者,发病均在12 h内。其中男性患者201例,女性患者88例,平均年龄(55.8±10.9)岁,分为经桡动脉介入(transradial coronary intervention,TRI)组142例与经股动脉介入(transfemoral coronary intervention,TFI)组147例。观察两组穿刺成功率、手术成功率、介入治疗时间、术后与穿刺相关并发症情况。结果TRI组142例患者,包括单支病变的患者82例,多支病变的患者60例,其中完全闭塞病变患者47例。TFI组147例患者,包括单支病变的患者85例,多支病变的患者62例,其中完全闭塞病变患者50例。两组病例基本特征比较差异无统计学意义。TRI组与TFI组手术穿刺成功率比较差异无统计学意义(98.6%比99.3%,P>0.05)。罪犯血管TIMI3级开通率,TRI组与TFI组比较差异无统计学意义(95.1%比93.9%,P>0.05)。从麻醉到第一次球囊扩张时间,TRI组为(29.1±6.2)min,TFI组为(27.5±7.0)min,P>0.05,从麻醉到指引导管撤出时间,TRI组为(47.3±16.0)min,TFI组为(43.0±17.1)min,P>0.05,两组比较差异无统计学意义。术后与穿刺相关的并发症,TRI组出现严重桡动脉痉挛3例,局部血肿2例。TFI组出现局部血肿7例,迷走反射12例,假性动脉瘤2例,排尿困难10例,腰痛5例。结论经桡动脉与经股动脉PCI治疗AMI同样具有较高的成功率,而术后与穿刺血管及其他因素相关的并发症的发生率,经桡动脉组却明显少于经股动脉组。因此桡动脉可作为给AMI患者行急诊PCI的常规途径之一。
关键词(KeyWords)： 动脉;血管成形术,经腔,经皮冠状动脉;心肌梗死
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 李为民,李悦,盛力,薛竞宜,杨树森,周立君,刘丕栋
参考文献(References)：
- [1]Yoo BS,Yoon J,Ko JY,et al.Anatomical consideration of theradial artery for transradial coronary procedures:arterial diameter,branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity.Int J Cardiol,2005,101:421-427.
- [2]Saito S,Tanaka S,Hiroe Y,et al.Comparative study on transradialapproach vs.transfemoral approach in primary stent implantation forpatients with acute myocardial infarction:results of the test formyocardial infarction by prospective unicenter randomization foraccess sites(TEMPURA)trial.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,59:26-33.
- [3]Louvard Y,Ludwig J,Lefevre T,et al.Transradial approach forcoronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction:adual-center registry.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2002,55:206-211.
- [4]Kim MH,Cha KS,Kim HJ,et al.Primary stenting for acutemyocardial infarction via the transradial approach:a safe and usefulalternative to the transfemoral approach.J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12:292-296.
- [5]Jang-Young Kim,Junghan Yoon,Hyun-Sook Jung,et al.Feasibilityof the radial artery as a vascular access route in performing primarypercutaneous coronary intervention Yonsei Med J,2005,46:503-510.
- [6]Chen CW,Lin CL,Lin TK,et al.A simple and effective regimenfor prevention of radial artery spasm during coronary catheterization.Cardiology,2006,105:43-47.