汤喆,白静,薛令合,杨学东,王蔚然,聂绍平,王禹

• 1:中国人民解放军总医院心血管内科
• 2:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院急诊危重症中心
• 3:山东省威海市立医院急诊科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的探讨冠状动脉光学相干断层成像(OCT)观察的重度钙化病变预处理后斑块形态学特点,对支架膨胀不良的影响。方法 2016年12月至2017年12月在中国人民解放军总医院心内科行冠状动脉旋磨术联合切割球囊成形术的重度钙化病变患者9例。对9个相关缺血病变均于旋磨联合切割预处理和支架置入后行OCT检查,记录最小管腔面积、钙化弧度、钙化长度、钙化厚度、钙化组织表面组织厚度、钙化环断裂、钙化小结、支架置入后支架面积、支架膨胀率、贴壁情况以及组织脱垂情况。2 mm为一病变节段,共收集148个病变节段,其中105个钙化节段。分析影响支架膨胀不良,贴壁不良的因素以及钙化环断裂的相关因素。结果多因素Logistic回归分析显示,最小管腔面积是支架膨胀不良的主要危险因素(OR 1.870,95%CI 1.021～3.425),而钙化环断裂是支架膨胀不良的保护因素(OR 0.160,95%CI 0.050～0.516)。钙化弧度是影响支架贴壁不良的主要预测因素(OR 1.006,95%CI1.001～1.011)。钙化表面组织厚度(OR0.000, 95%CI0.000～0.001)以及钙化弧度(OR 1.008, 95%CI1.002～1.015)是钙化环断裂的主要预测因素。在105例钙化节段中,按钙化表面组织厚度分组,厚度≤0.1mm钙化节段组47个和厚度> 0.1mm钙化节段组58个。厚度≤0.1mm钙化节段组中,钙化断裂的比例(76.6%)明显高于厚度> 0.1 mm钙化节段组(10.3%),差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。结论重度钙化病变预处理后,钙化环断裂以及管腔面积的增加,可能有助于支架良好膨胀。有较大钙化弧度、表面组织薄的钙化环,经过旋磨联合切割预处理,易于出现钙化环的断裂。

关键词(KeyWords)： 冠状动脉钙化;支架膨胀不良;光学相干断层成像;冠状动脉旋磨术;切割球囊成形术

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 汤喆,白静,薛令合,杨学东,王蔚然,聂绍平,王禹

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Foin N,Lu S,Ng J,et al.Stent malapposition and the risk of stent thrombosis:mechanistic insights from an in-vitro model.EuroIntervention,2017,13(19):e1096-e1098.
• [2]Shan P,Mintz GS,Witzenbichler B,et al.Does calcium burden impact culprit lesion morphology and clinical results?An ADAPT-DES IVUS substudy.Int J Cardiol,2017,248:97-102.
• [3]Kobayashi Y,Okura H,Kume T,et al.Impact of target lesion coronary calcification on stent expansion.Circ J,2014,78(9):2209-2214.
• [4]Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC,et al.2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention.A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions.J Am Coll Cardiol,2011,58(24):e44-122.
• [5]Li Q,He Y,Chen L,et al.Intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon before drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with severely calcified coronary lesions:a pilot clinical study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord,2016,16:112.
• [6]Tang Z,Bai J,Su S,et al.Aggressive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon for optimal stent expansion in calcified lesions.J Geriatr Cardiol,2016,13(12):984-991.
• [7]Lotfi A,Jeremias A,Fearon WF,et al.Expert consensus statement on the use of fractional flow reserve,intravascular ultrasound,and optical coherence tomography:a consensus statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2014,83(4):509-518.
• [8]Wang X,Matsumura M,Mintz G,et al.In Vivo calcium detection by com paring optical coherence tomogra phy,intravascular ultrasound,and angiography.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging,2017,10(8):869-879.
• [9]Maehara A,Ben-Yehuda O,Ali Z,et al.Comparison of stent expansion guided by optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound:the ILUMIEN II study(observational study of optical coherence tomography[OCT]in patients undergoing f ractional flow reserve[FFR]and percutaneous coronary intervention).JACC Cardiovasc Interve,2015,8(13):1704-1714.
• [10]侯静波,于波.光学相干断层成像技术的临床应用--从替补到主力.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2010,18(5):293-298.
• [11]中华医学会心血管病学分会介入心脏病学组,心血管病影像学组.光学相干断层成像技术在冠心病介入诊疗领域的应用中国专家建议.中华心血管病杂志,2017,45(1):5-12.
• [12]Wijns W,Shite J,Jones M,et al.Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making:ILUMIEN I study.Eur Heart J,2015,36(47):3346-3355.
• [13]Souteyrand G,Amabile N,Mangin L,et al.Mechanisms of stent thrombosis analysed by optical coherence tomography:insights from the national PESTO French registry.Eur Heart J,2016,37(15):1208-1216.
• [14]Kubo T,Shinke T,Okamura T,et al.Optical frequency domain imaging vs.intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention(OPINION trial):Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.J Cardiol,2016,68(5):455-460.
• [15]Vaquerizo B,Serra A,Miranda F,et al.Aggressive plaque modif ication with rotational atherectomy and/or cutting balloon bef ore d r ug-el u ting sten t im pla n ta tion f or t he treatment of calcif ied coronary lesions.J Interv Cardiol,2010,23(3):240-248.
• [16]Furuichi S,Tobaru T,Asano R,et al.Rotational atherectomy f ollowed by cutting-balloon plaque modif ication f or drugeluting stent implantation in calcified coronary lesions.J Invasive Cardiol,2012,24(5):191-195.
• [17]Okura H,Hayase M,Shimodozono S,et al.Mechanisms of acute lumen gain following cutting balloon angioplasty in calcified and noncalcified lesions:an intravascular ultrasound study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2002,57(4):429-436.
• [18]Lee MS,Shah N.The Impact and Pathophysiologic Consequences of Coronary Artery Calcium Deposition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.J Invasive Cardiol,2016,28(4):160-167.
• [19]Abdel-Wahab M,Richardt G,Joachim Buttner H,et al.High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions:the randomized ROTAXUS(Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease)trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6(1):10-19.
• [20]葛均波,王伟民,霍勇.冠状动脉内旋磨术中国专家共识.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(2):61-66.