尹磊,张媛媛,何长健,刘倩,谢瑞芹

• 1:河北医科大学第二医院心内科

摘要(Abstract)：

近年来高功率短时程消融作为心房颤动（房颤）射频消融的新理念，因其手术操作时间短、能改善损伤的连续性以及降低房颤复发率而备受人们关注。众多的研究也证实了其在诸多方面均优于常规消融。然而，文献报道高功率短时程消融在临床实际操作过程中仍需要注意一些问题。现本文就高功率短时程消融的研究进展进行综述。

关键词(KeyWords)： 高功率短时程消融;心房颤动;有效性;安全性

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 河北省政府资助专科能力建设和专科带头人培养项目（361004）

作者(Author): 尹磊,张媛媛,何长健,刘倩,谢瑞芹

参考文献(References)：

• [1] Asad ZUA,Yousif A,Khan MS,et al. Catheter ablation versus medical therapy for atrial fibrillation:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2019,12(9):e007414.
• [2] Nilsson B,Chen X,Pehrson S,et al. The ef fectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation[J].Europace,2006,8(11):962-965.
• [3] Winkle RA,Mohanty S,Patrawala RA,et al. Low complication rates using high power(45-50 W)for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations[J]. Heart Rhythm,2019,16(2):165-169.
• [4] Chen CF,Wu J,Jin CL,et al. Comparison of high-power shortduration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation:systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Clin Cardiol,2020,43(12):1631-1640.
• [5] Bourier F,Duchateau J,Vlachos K,et al. High-power shortduration versus standard radiofrequency ablation:insights on lesion metrics[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2018,29(11):1570-1575.
• [6] Leshem E,Zilberman I,Tschabrunn CM,et al. Highpower and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation:biophysical characterization[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2018,4(4):467-479.
• [7] Kewcharoen J,Techorueangwiwat C,Kanitsoraphan C,et al. High-power short duration and low-power long duration in atrial fibrillation ablation:a meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(1):71-82.
• [8] Liu X,Gui C,Wen W,et al. Safety and e fficacy of high power shorter duration ablation guided by ablation index or lesion size index in atrial fibrillation ablation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Interv Cardiol,2021,2021:5591590.
• [9] Ravi V,Poudyal A,Abid QU,et al. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Europace,2021,23(5):710-721.
• [10] Yavin HD,Leshem E,Shapira-Daniels A,et al. Impact of high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2020,6(8):973-985.
• [11] Guandalini GS,Marchlinski FE. High power,short duration ablation:at least for the right pulmonary vein carina,maybe not so fast[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(5):1229-1231.
• [12] Chen S,Schmidt B,Bordignon S,et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation index-guided high-power technique:Frankfurt AI high-power 15-month follow-up[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(3):616-624.
• [13] Yazaki K,Ejima K,Kanai M,et al. Impedance drop predicts acute electrical reconnection of the pulmonary vein-left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation using short-duration high-power exposure[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2020,59(3):575-584.
• [14] Dikdan SJ,Junarta J,Bodempudi S,et al. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power shortduration,standard-power standard-duration,and temperaturecontrolled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(3):608-615.
• [15] Ejima K,Higuchi S,Yazaki K,et al. Comparison of highpower and conventional-power radiofrequency energy deliveries in pulmonary vein isolation using unipolar signal modification as a local endpoint[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020,31(7):1702-1708.
• [16] Hansom SP,Alqarawi W,Birnie DH,et al. High-power,short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach:outcomes and reconnection patterns[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(5):1219-1228.
• [17] Golian M,Ramirez FD,Alqarawi W,et al. High-power shortduration radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter[J].Heart Rhythm O2,2020,1(5):317-323.
• [18] Bourier F,Sommer P. The shorter,the better?:short duration ablation,catheter stability,and lesion durability[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2020,6(8):986-988.
• [19] Winkle RA,Mead RH,Engel G,et al. High-power,short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters:outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation[J]. Heart Rhythm,2020,17(8):1223-1231.
• [20] Leo M,Pedersen M,Rajappan K,et al. Power,lesion size index and oesophageal temperature alerts during atrial fibrillation ablation:a randomized study[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2020,13(10):e008316.
• [21] Berte B,Hilfiker G,Russi I,et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a higher power shorter duration CLOSE protocol with a surround flow ablation catheter[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(11):2199-2204.
• [22] Shin DG,Ahn J,Han SJ,et al. Efficacy of high-power and short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation:a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Europace,2020,22(10):1495-1501.
• [23] Okamatsu H,Koyama J,Sakai Y,et al. High-power application is associated with shorter procedure time and higher rate of firstpass pulmonary vein isolation in ablation index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(12):2751-2758.
• [24] Hussein AA,Barakat AF,Saliba WI,et al. Persistent atrial fibrillation ablation with or without contact force sensing[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2017,28(5):483-488.
• [25] Kusa S,Hachiya H,Sato Y,et al. Superior vena cava isolation with 50 W high power,short duration ablation strategy[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(6):1602-1609.
• [26] Kaneshiro T,Kamioka M,Hijioka N,et al. Characteristics of esophageal injury in ablation of atrial fibrillation using a high-power short-duration setting[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2020,13(10):e008602.
• [27] Vassallo F,Meigre LL,Serpa E,et al. Changes and impacts in early recurrences after atrial fibrillation ablation in contact force era:comparison of high-power short-duration with conventional technique-FIRST experience data[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2021,62(2):363-371.
• [28] Vassallo F,Cunha C,Serpa E,et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration(HPSD)ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique:initial results[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(10):1877-1883.
• [29] Castrejón-Castrejón S,Martínez Cossiani M,Ortega Molina M,et al. Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application:shortterm results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2020,57(1):57-65.
• [30] Wielandts JY,Kyriakopoulou M,Almorad A,et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of high power during CLOSE-guided pulmonary vein isolation:the POWER-AF study[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2021,14(1):e009112.
• [31] Vassallo F,Meigre LL,Serpa E,et al. Reduced esophageal heating in high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation in the contact force catheter era[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2021,44(7):1185-1192.
• [32] Calkins H,Natale A,Gomez T,et al. Comparing rates of atrioesophageal fistula with contact force-sensing and noncontact force-sensing catheters:analysis of post-market safety surveillance data[J]. J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2020,59(1):49-55.
• [33] Chen S,Schmidt B,Bordignon S,et al. Ablation index-guided50 W ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation:procedural data,lesion analysis,and initial results from the FAFA AI high power study[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(12):2724-2731.
• [34] Wolf M,El Haddad M,De Wilde V,et al. Endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency applications[J]. Heart Rhythm,2019,16(7):1013-1020.
• [35] Kaneshiro T,Amami K,Hijioka N,et al. Significance of contact force on esophageal thermal injury during relative highpower short-duration ablation of atrial fibrillation[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol,2021,14(6):e009897.
• [36] Chen S,Chun KRJ,Tohoku S,et al. Esophageal endoscopy after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation-index guided high-power:Frankfurt AI-HP ESO-I[J]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2020,6(10):1253-1261.
• [37] Chen S,Schmidt B,Seeger A,et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using ablation index-guided high power(50 W)for pulmonary vein isolation with or without esophageal temperature probe(the AI-HP ESOⅡ)[J]. Heart Rhythm,2020,17(11):1833-1840.
• [38] Ha FJ,Han HC,Sanders P,et al. Prevalence and prevention of oesophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Europace,2019,21(1):80-90.
• [39] Barbhaiya CR,Kogan EV,Jankelson L,et al. Esophageal temperature dynamics during high-power short-duration posterior wall ablation[J]. Heart Rhythm,2020,17(5 Pt A):721-727.
• [40] Wittkampf FH,Nakagawa H. RF catheter ablation:lessons on lesions[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2006,29(11):1285-1297.
• [41] Knecht S,Sacher F,Forclaz A,et al. Is there a potential benefit to increased irrigation channels during radiofrequency ablation?Results from a two-center prospective randomized study[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2011,22(5):516-520.
• [42] Kwon HJ,Lee SS,Park YJ,et al. Ef fectiveness and safety of high-power and short-duration ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in atrial flutter[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2020,43(9):941-946.
• [43] Zanchi S,Chen S,Bordignon S,et al. Ablation index-guided high-power(50 W)short-duration for left atrial anterior and roofline ablation:feasibility,procedural data,and lesion analysis(AI high-power linear ablation)[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2021,32(4):984-993.