胸痛中心建设对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治的影响Impact of chest pain center establishment on emergency care of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
刘璇,李树仁,杨国慧,郑梅,郝潇,肖洒
摘要(Abstract):
目的探讨胸痛中心建设对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治时间和院内不良事件发生率的影响。方法纳入2016年9月至2017年12月于河北省人民医院行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的275例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。将通过胸痛中心认证前的121例患者设为对照组,通过胸痛中心认证后的154例患者设为研究组,比较两组患者入门至球囊扩张时间、首次医疗接触至球囊扩张时间、发病至首次医疗接触时间及院内主要不良心脑血管事件发生率,并对院内主要不良心脑血管事件发生的影响因素进行logistic回归分析。结果研究组患者入门至球囊扩张时间[51(34,65)min比61(45,75)min,P<0.001]和首次医疗接触至球囊扩张时间[83(62,117)min比96(70,127)min,P=0.032]均明显少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义;研究组患者发病至首次医疗接触时间虽大于对照组[101(38,188)min比85(53,186)min,P=0.920],但差异无统计学意义;与对照组相比,研究组患者院内主要不良心脑血管事件发生率更低(16.9%比27.3%,P=0.037),差异有统计学意义。多因素回归分析显示,Kilip心功能分级Ⅲ~Ⅳ级(OR 9.754,95%CI 3.548~26.813,P<0.001)及入门至球囊扩张时间>60 min(OR 1.816,95%CI 1.052~3.135,P=0.032)是发生院内主要不良心脑血管事件的独立危险因素。结论通过认证后胸痛中心持续规范化建设可进一步缩短急性心肌梗死救治时间,尤其是将入门至球囊扩张时间缩短到60 min之内,可降低患者院内不良事件发生率。
关键词(KeyWords): 胸痛中心;ST段抬高型心肌梗死;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 刘璇,李树仁,杨国慧,郑梅,郝潇,肖洒
参考文献(References):
- [1]NallamothuBK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM. Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med,2007, 357(16):1631-1638.
- [2]向定成,段天兵,秦伟毅,等.建立规范化胸痛中心对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者进门-球囊扩张时间及预后的影响.中华心血管病杂志, 2013, 41(7):568-571.
- [3]向定成,霍勇,方唯一,等.中国胸痛中心认证标准(2015年11月修订).中国介入心脏病学杂志,2016,24(3):121-130.
- [4]RossMA, AmsterdamE, PeacockWF, etal. Chest pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for medicare and medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol, 2008, 102(2):120-124.
- [5]薛迎生,江建军,章晨,等.优化直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗流程对ST段心肌梗死患者预后的影响.中国介入心脏病学杂志, 2011,19(3):137-140.
- [6]Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation:the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC). Eur Heart J,2018, 39(2):119-177.
- [7]易绍东,霍勇,向定成.胸痛中心认证对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院前救治效率的影响.中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(1):11-15.
- [8]BucholzEM, ButalaNM, NormandST, etal.Associationof guideline-based admission treatments and life expectancy after myocardial infarction in elderly medicare beneficiaries. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 67(20):2378-2391.
- [9]Foo CY, Bonsu KO, Nallamothu BK, et al. Coronary intervention door-to-balloon time and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a meta-analysis. Heart, 2018, 104(16):1362-1369.
- [10]BergerPB, EllisSG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction:results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in acute coronary syndromes(GUSTO-Ⅱb)trial. Circulation, 1999, 100(1):14-20.
- [11]Lee WC, Fang HY, Chen HC, et al. Effect of improved door-toballoon time on clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 240:66-71.
- [12]Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, et al. Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI. N Engl J Med,2013, 369(10):901-909.
- [13]KoulS, AndellP, Martinsson A, et al. Delay from first medical contact to primary PCI and all-cause mortality:a nationwide study of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc, 2014, 3(2):e000486.
- [14]陈国钦,张稳柱,李健豪,等.胸痛中心模式下不同到院方式对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者再灌注时间的影响.中国循环杂志,2017, 32(9):859-863.
- [15]J?ger B, Farhan S, Rohla M, et al. Clinical predictors of patient related delay in the VIENNA ST-elevation myocardial infarction network and impact on long-term mortality. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2017, 6(3):254-261.