接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高心肌梗死患者近期预后的变化趋势Temporal trends in short-term outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
王辉,刘震宇,张抒扬,沈珠军,范中杰,曾勇,谢洪智,王崇慧,金晓峰,方全
摘要(Abstract):
目的研究近12年来接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,STEMI)患者近期预后的变化趋势。方法收集北京协和医院自2003年4月至2015年3月行直接PCI的全部STEMI患者资料,根据STEMI的发病时间将患者分为第一组(2003年4月至2007年3月,362例)、第二组(2007年4月至2011年3月,424例)和第三组(2011年4月至2015年3月,417例),分析心血管疾病危险因素、药物和PCI情况以及30 d预后的变化趋势。结果入选1203例行直接PCI的STEMI患者,平均年龄(62.2±12.6)岁,男954例(79.3%)。三组吸烟患者比例分别是62.4%、60.8%、54.0%,有显著降低趋势(P=0.015)。三组患者β阻滞药的使用率分别为90.9%、89.9%、85.9%,有显著降低趋势(P=0.024);血管紧张素转化酶抑制药/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗药的使用率分别为87.8%、86.3%、70.3%,有显著降低趋势(P<0.001);血小板糖蛋白Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗药使用率分别为10.8%、51.7%、60.0%,有显著上升趋势(P<0.001),但阿司匹林、P2Y12抑制剂及他汀类的使用率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。PCI成功率分别为89.0%、92.0%、98.3%,有显著升高趋势(P<0.001)。症状-球囊扩张时间分别为270(180,480)min、270(180,450)min、360(240,540)min,有显著延长趋势(P<0.001);症状-入门时间分别为150(90,330)min、150(90,287)min、180(114,360)min,有显著延长趋势(P=0.010),但入门-球囊扩张时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.379)。在30 d预后方面,全因死亡率分别为9.1%、3.8%、2.9%;心源性死亡率分别为6.9%、2.8%、2.2%;再发心肌梗死率分别为2.5%、1.2%、0.2%;心力衰竭发生率分别为18.2%、14.2%、11.3%,均有显著降低趋势(均P<0.05)。校正相关基线因素后,30 d全因死亡率仍有下降趋势[相对风险(relative risk,RR)0.541,95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI)0.382~0.765,P=0.001]。与第一组相比,第二组(RR 0.397,95%CI 0.214~0.739,P=0.004)和第三组(RR 0.328,95%CI 0.167~0.676,P=0.001)的30 d死亡风险均降低。结论在12年间,行直接PCI的STEMI患者的30 d总死亡率有持续下降趋势。
关键词(KeyWords): 心肌梗死;经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;趋势;预后
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 王辉,刘震宇,张抒扬,沈珠军,范中杰,曾勇,谢洪智,王崇慧,金晓峰,方全
参考文献(References):
- [1]Steg PG,James SK,Atar D,et al.ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.Eur Heart J,2012,33(20):2569-2619.
- [2]O'Gara PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD,et al.2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(4):e78-e140.
- [3]Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC,et al.2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.J Am Coll Cardiol,2011,58(24):e44-e122.
- [4]Windecker S,Kolh P,Alfonso F,et al.2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization:The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)and the European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery(EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions(EAPCI).Eur Heart J,2014,35(37):2541-2619.
- [5]Li J,Li X,Wang Q,et al.ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in China from 2001 to 2011(the China PEACERetrospective Acute Myocardial Infarction Study):a retrospective analysis of hospital data.Lancet,2015,385(9966):441-451.
- [6]Ortolani P,Marino M,Melandri G,et al.Recent temporal trends for first-time hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction.Treatment patterns and clinical outcome in a large cohort study.Am Heart J,2013,166(5):846-854.
- [7]Tisminetzky M,Mc Manus DD,Gore JM,et al.30-year trends in patient characteristics,treatment practices,and long-term outcomes of adults aged 35 to 54 years hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2014,113(7):1137-1141.
- [8]Krumholz HM,Wang Y,Chen J,et al.Reduction in acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States:riskstandardized mortality rates from 1995-2006.JAMA,2009,302(7):767-773.
- [9]Iqbal Z,Cohen M,Pollack C,et al.Safety and efficacy of adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed from the radial approach for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol,2013,111(12):1727-1733.
- [10]Nordmann AJ,Hengstler P,Harr T,et al.Clinical outcomes of primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with myocardial infarction:a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am J Med,2004,116(4):253-262.
- [11]Stone GW,Grines CL,Cox DA,et al.Comparison of angioplasty with stenting,with or without abciximab,in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,2002,346(13):957-966.
- [12]Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC,et al.2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction:an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2016,67(10):1235-1250.
- [13]Krumholz HM,Chen J,Rathore SS,et al.Regional variation in the treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction:investigating New England's advantage.Am Heart J,2003,146(2):242-249.
- [14]Nallamothu BK,Young J,Gurm HS,et al.Recent trends in hospital utilization for acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization in the United States.Am J Cardiol,2007,99(6):749-753.
- [15]Lassen JF,Btker HE,Terkelsen CJ.Timely and optimal treatment of patients with STEMI.Nat Rev Cardiol,2013,10(1):41-48.
- [16]De Luca G,Suryapranata H,Ottervanger JP,et al.Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction:every minute of delay counts.Circulation,2004,109(10):1223-1225.
- [17]Denktas AE,Anderson HV,Mc Carthy J,et al.Total ischemic time:the correct focus of attention for optimal ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care.JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2011,4(6):599-604.