使用二代冷冻球囊消融右下肺静脉难易程度的影响因素Factors influencing ablation of right inferior pulmonary vein using second-generation cryoballoon
张坤,孙光瑶,白金龙,王沛泽,方丕华
摘要(Abstract):
目的 分析心房颤动(房颤)使用二代冷冻球囊消融时影响右下肺静脉消融难易程度的因素。方法 回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年3月在泰达国际心血管病医院首次使用二代冷冻球囊消融治疗房颤的患者234例,所有患者术前均已完善左心房CT血管造影(CTA)检查,收集其肺静脉内径(长径、短径)、内径比、测量右下肺静脉角度(下向角度、后向角度)、肺间距、开口高度、早分支情况等,根据右下肺静脉冷冻次数是否≥3次,分为容易组和困难组。结果 纳入234例患者,年龄(62.8±8.1)岁,女性87例(37.2%),阵发性房颤164例(70.1%),困难组56例,容易组178例。所有患者均实现肺静脉隔离,容易组患者右下肺静脉冷冻的最低温度更低[(–48.0±6.2)℃比(–44.6±6.5)℃,P<0.001)],肺静脉电位实时记录率更高(49.4%比33.9%,P=0.042);困难组患者,早期病例(2019年度病例)的比例更高(46.4%比19.7%,P <0.001);容易组与困难组患者右下肺静脉下向成角差异有统计学意义[(59.5±12.3)°比(65.1±14.6)°,P=0.005];内径、内径比、两肺间距、开口高度、后向成角、早分支等差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。纳入上述解剖因素和是否早期病例进行Logistic回归分析,下向成角和早期病例是影响肺静脉消融难易程度的独立危险因素(OR 0.968,95%CI 0.943~0.993,P=0.013;OR 0.285,95%CI 0.143~0.565,P=0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线显示,使用下向成角预测右下肺静脉封堵困难的曲线下面积0.745(95%CI 0.668~0.822,P<0.001),最佳截断值63.5°,敏感度67.9%,特异度71.9%。结论 在冷冻消融术中,右下肺静脉的下向成角和术者的手术熟练度是影响手术难易程度的主要因素。
关键词(KeyWords): 心房颤动;冷冻消融;解剖
基金项目(Foundation): 天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目(TJYXZDXK-020A)
作者(Author): 张坤,孙光瑶,白金龙,王沛泽,方丕华
参考文献(References):
- [1]Wazni OM,Dandamudi G,Sood N,et al.Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2021,384(4):316-324.DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2029554.
- [2]Bordignon S,Chen S,Bologna F,et al.Optimizing cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation:lessons from>1000procedures-the Frankfurt approach[J].Europace,2021,23(6):868-877.DOI:10.1093/europace/euaa406.
- [3]Martins RP,Nicolas A,Galand V,et al.The challenging right inferior pulmonary vein:a systematic approach for successful cryoballoon ablation[J].Arch Cardiovasc Dis,2019,112(8-9):502-511.DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2019.05.006.
- [4] Velagic V,de Asmundis C,Mugnai G,et al.Learning curve using the second-generation cryoballoon ablation[J].J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown),2017,18(7):518-527.DOI:10.245 9/JCM.0000000000000493.
- [5]Kuck KH,Brugada J,Fürnkranz A,et al.Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2016,374(23):2235-2245.DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
- [6]Andrade JG,Wells GA,Deyell MW,et al.Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation[J].N Engl J Med,2021,384(4):305-315.DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2029980.
- [7]刘俊,方丕华.从循证医学证据看冷冻球囊消融治疗心房颤动的临床应用[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(2):111-113.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2017.02.011.
- [8]Ha?ssaguerre M,Ja?s P,Shah DC,et al.Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins[J].N Engl J Med,1998,339(10):659-666.DOI:10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
- [9]Buist TJ,Adiyaman A,Smit JJJ,et al.Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation[J].Clin Res Cardiol,2018,107(6):498-506.DOI:10.1007/S00392-018-1211-9.
- [10]Mugnai G,Cecchini F,Stroker E,et al.Pulmonary vein size is associated with reconnection following cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation[J].J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2022,65(3):717-724.DOI:10.1007/s10840-022-01330-w.
- [11]Yalin K,Lyan E,Abdin A,et al.Second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with pulmonary vein abnormality:safety,efficacy and lessons from re-ablation procedures[J].Int J Cardiol,2018,272:142-148.DOI:10.1016/j.ij card.2018.07.033.
- [12]Stroker E.de Asmundis C,Saitoh Y,et al.Anatomic predictors of phrenic nerve injury in the setting of pulmonary vein isolation using the 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon[J].Heart Rhythm,2016,13(2):342-351.DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.017.
- [13]Huang HD,Pietrasik G,Abid QU,et al.Supplemental radiofrequency ablation after acutely unsuccessful cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation is associated with increased risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation[J].J Am Heart Assoc,2020,9(10):e015979.DOI:10.J161/JAHA.120.015979.
- [14]Li JH,Xie HY,Sun Q,et al.Comparison of using secondgeneration cryoballoon and radiofrequency catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with the common ostium of inferior pulmonary veins[J].Front Cardiovasc Med,2022,8:794834.DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.794834.
- [15]Borio G,Maj R,Alessandro R,et al.Pulmonary veins anatomical determinants of cooling kinetics during second-generation cryoballoon ablation[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020,31(3):629-637.DOI:10.1111/jce.14356.
- [16] Terasawa M,Chierchia GB,Takarada K,et al.Anatomic predictors of late right inferior pulmonary vein reconnection in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon ablation[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2019,30(11):2294-2301.DOI:10.1111/jce.14186.
- [17]Velagic V,de Asmundis C,Mugnai G,et al.Learning curve using the second-generation cryoballoon ablation[J].J Cardiovasc Med(Hagerstown),2017,18(7):518-527.DOI:10.2459/JCM.M000000000000493.
- [18] Yokoyama K,Tokuda M,Matsuo S,et al.Pulmonary vein re-mapping after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation[J].Europace,2018,20(6):943-948.DOI:10.1093/europace/eux129.
- [19]Martins RP,Galand V,Cesari O,et al.The second generation cryoballoon has improved durable isolation of left but not right pulmonary veins:new insights from a multicentre study[J].Europace,2018,20(7):1115-1121.DOI:10.1093/europace/eux200.
- [20] Farkowski MM,Karlinski M,Barra S,et al.Effectiveness and safety of a single freeze strategy of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation:an EHRA systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Europace,2022,24(1):58-69.DOI:10.1093/europace/euab133.