童兰,成联超,张翠,王燕凤,周名纲,陈应忠,蔡琳

• 1:西南交通大学附属成都市第三人民医院心内科
• 2:西南交通大学医学院

摘要(Abstract)：

目的探讨区域协同救治体系中院间社交网络联系的建立为转运经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者带来的救治获益。方法纳入2017年1月至2018年12月就诊于成都9家PCI医院行转运PCI的STEMI患者267例,根据是否利用社交网络传输首诊信息将其分为资料传输组(151例)和资料未传输组(116例)。比较两组患者的基本临床特征、救治延误时间、院内急性心力衰竭发生率、院内死亡率、随访主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率,并做logistic回归分析,分析影响首次医疗接触至球囊扩张(FMC2B)时间达标的因素。结果两组患者基线资料及造影资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。资料未传输组患者FMC2B时间[202(145,318) min比152(110,230)min,P<0.001]、首诊医院进门至出门(DIDO)时间[70(33,176)min比45(26,83) min,P=0.001]及进入PCI医院大门至球囊扩张(D2B)时间[84(55,121)min比65(36,88)min,P<0.001]显著大于资料传输组,且资料传输组患者FMC2B时间(29.1%比13.8%,P=0.003)、D2B时间(78.8%比55.2%,P<0.001)、DIDO时间(37.8%比23.3%,P=0.012)的达标率均高于资料未传输组,差异均有统计学意义。logistic多因素分析显示,首诊10 min内完成心电图(OR 2.853,95%CI 1.198～6.794,P<0.001)、资料网络传输(OR 2.433,95%CI 1.241～4.773,P=0.010)与FMC2B达标率上升呈显著正相关。两组患者30 d、90 d MACCE比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);但1年MACCE发生率资料未传输组患者(19.3%比8.1%,P=0.049)显著高于资料传输组,差异有统计学意义。结论采取临床资料网络传输的患者的FMC2B时间、DIDO时间和D2B时间更契合胸痛中心救治时间质控标准,且有更好的临床结局。

关键词(KeyWords)： 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;社交网络;资料传输;救治效率

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 四川省应用基础研究重点项目(2018JY0126)

作者(Author): 童兰,成联超,张翠,王燕凤,周名纲,陈应忠,蔡琳

参考文献(References)：

• [1]O’Gara PT,Kushner FG,Ascheim DD,et al.2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction:executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines.J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(4):485-510.
• [2]Steg PG,James SK,Atar D,et al.ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.Eur Heart J,2012,33(20):2569-2619.
• [3]Pinto DS,Frederick PD,Chakrabarti AK,et al.Benefit of transferring ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients for percutaneous coronary intervention compared with administration of onsite fibrinolytic declines as delays increaseclinical perspective.Circulation,2011,124(23):2512-2521.
• [4]Carrillo X,Fernandez-Nofrerias E,Rodriguez-Leor O,et al.Early ST elevation myocardial infarction in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention centres:In situ fibrinolysis vs percutaneous coronary intervention transfer.Eur Heart J,2016,37(13):1034-1040.
• [5]Levine GN,Bates ER,Blankenship JC,et al.2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention:executive summary:a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions.Circulation,2011,124(23):2574-2609.
• [6]中华医学会心血管病学分会，中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南.中华心血管病杂志，2015,43(5):380-393．
• [7]Lee MS,Kapoor N,Jamal F,et al.Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drugeluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47(4):864-870.
• [8]Squire BT,Tamayo-Sarver JH,Rashi P,et al.Effect of prehospital cardiac catheterization lab activation on door-to-balloon time,mortality,and false-positive activation.Prehosp Emerq Care,2014,18(1):1-8.
• [9]Yu SH,Shih HM,Chang SS,et al.Social media communication shorten door-to balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Medicine(Baltimore),2019,98(10):e14791.
• [10]Bosson N,Baruch T,French WJ,et al.Regional“call 911”emergency department protocol to reduce interfacility transfer delay for patients with ST‐segment-elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Heart Assoc,2017,6(12).pii:e006898.
• [11]Koul S,Andell P,Martinsson A,et al.Delay from first medical contact to primary PCI and all-cause mortality:a nationwide study of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Heart Assoc,2014,3(2):e000486.
• [12]Kawecki D,Gierlotka M,Morawiec B,et al.Direct admission versus interhospital transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.JACCCardiovasc Interv,2017,10(5):438-447.
• [13]McNamara RL,Wang Y,Herrin J,et al.Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,47(11):2180-2186.
• [14]Nallamothu BK,Bradley EH,Krumholz HM.Time to treatment inprimary percutaneous coronary intervention.N Engl J Med,2007,357(16):1631-1638.
• [15]Rokos IC,French WJ,Koenig WJ,et al.Integration of pre-hospital electrocardiograms and ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving center(SRC)networks:impact on door-to-balloon times across 10independent regions.JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2009,2(4):339-346.
• [16]陈文明，郭金成，柳子静，等.ST段抬高心肌梗死首次医疗接触-梗死相关动脉开通时间达标情况及影响因素.中国介入心脏病学杂志，2016,24(6):316-319.
• [17]Terkelsen CJ,S?rensen JT,Maeng M,et al.System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.JAMA,2010,304(7):763-771.
• [18]Wang TY,Nallamothu BK,Krumholz HM,et al.Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.JAMA,2011,305(24):2540-2547.