赵宇新,陈国秀,秦菘,李占鲁,黄翯

• 1:新疆生产建设兵团第七师医院心内科
• 2:浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院心内科

摘要(Abstract)：

目的分析患者依从性在血流储备分数(fractional flow reserve,FFR)指导冠状动脉临界病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)中的影响。方法选取2013年10月至2015年9月在新疆生产建设兵团第七师医院和浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院心导管室行冠状动脉造影(coronary angiography,CAG)显示冠状动脉狭窄病变为临界病变的患者303例,依据患者的依从性分为三组:(1)FFR指导PCI组96例(行FFR检查,FFR≤0.8者行PCI治疗,FFR>0.8者药物治疗);(2)药物组126例(拒绝行FFR检查及PCI);(3)直接PCI组81例(拒绝FFR检查,要求行PCI治疗)。平均随访(19.6±6.5)个月,观察各组主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular event,MACE)及心绞痛缓解情况。结果 FFR指导PCI组患者的心绞痛明显缓解率高于药物组和直接PCI组[82例(85.4%)比88例(69.8%)比65例(80.2%),P=0.018],无MACE事件生存率高于药物组和直接PCI组[90例(93.8%)比97例(77.0%)比66例(81.5%),P=0.006],差异均有统计学意义。结论 FFR是临床指导冠状动脉临界病变治疗方案选择的科学可靠的方法,患者依从性的高低会直接导致预后的差异。

关键词(KeyWords)： 冠状动脉临界病变;血流储备分数;依从性

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 赵宇新,陈国秀,秦菘,李占鲁,黄翯

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Fischer JJ,Samady H,Mcpherson JA,et al.Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity.Am J Cardiol,2002,90(3):210-215.
• [2]Tobis J,Azarbal B,Slavin L.Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory.J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49(8):839-848.
• [3]Topol EJ,Nissen SE.Our preoccupation with coronary luminology-the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic-heart-disease.Circulation,1995,92(8):2333-2342.
• [4]Pijls NH,van Son JA,Kirkeeide RL,et al.Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary,myocardial,and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Circulation,1993,87(4):1354-1367.
• [5]Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.N Engl J Med,2009,360(3):213-224.
• [6]左辉华,刘强,张志玲,等.血管内超声或血流储备分数指导冠状动脉临界病变介入治疗的临床效果.南方医科大学学报,2014,34(5):704-708.
• [7]Bech GJ,De Bruyne S,Pijls NH,et al.Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis-A randomized trial.Circulation,2001,103(24):2928-2934.
• [8]De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,Kalesan B,et al.Fractional flow reserveguided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease.N Engl J Med,2012,367(11):991-1001.
• [9]Pijls NH,Fearon WF,Tonino PA,et al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease:2-year followup of the FAME(Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation)study.J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56(3):177-184.
• [10]Latacz P,Rostoff P,Gackowski A,et al.Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment versus percutaneous coronary angioplasty in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions.Kardiol Pol,2009,67(8A):1004-1012.
• [11]Glaser R,Selzer F,Faxon DP,et al.Clinical progression of incidental,asymptomatic lesions discovered during culprit vessel coronary intervention.Circulation,2005,111(2):143-149.
• [12]Li J,Rihal CS,Matsuo Y,et al.Sex-related differences in fractional flow reserve-guided treatment.Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6(6):662-670.
• [13]Lansky AJ,Goto K,Cristea E,et al.Clinical and angiographic predictors of short-and long-term ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes:results from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strateg Y(ACUITY)trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2010,3(4):308-316.