陈一文,秦明照

• 1: 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院(原北京急救中心)
• 2:首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院(原北京急救中心)

摘要(Abstract)：

目的探讨将来自于临床试验的介入治疗心肌梗死的危险评分(PAMI评分)应用于普通患有ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受直接PCI治疗的患者,评判其预测价值,以及冠状动脉病变程度与左心室射血分数对危险分层的意义。方法应用PAMI评分对2002年3月至2004年5月因STEMI连续行直接PCI的患者206例进行危险分层,并电话随访6个月至1年的死亡率。计数资料应用秩和检验,计量资料用独立样本t检验,并应用非条件logistic回归分析各变量与发病后6个月的死亡率的关系。结果随访到的183例患者中,PAMI评分在0~2分者有88例,3~5分者有54例,6~8分者有17例,≥9分有24例,死亡率分别为1·1%(1/88),3·7%(2/54),17·6%(3/17),41·7%(10/24),4组之间差异有统计学意义。Logistic回归分析显示冠状动脉血管病变支数是介入治疗后STEMI患者的危险因素(相对危险度10·186),而左心室射血分数(LVEF)则为保护性因素(相对危险度0·849)。PAMI评分联合冠状动脉3支病变及入院48h内的LVEF值可以增强死亡率的预测价值。结论PAMI危险评分可以作为简便易行的方法评价直接PCI治疗后STEMI患者的死亡率,同时联合冠状动脉病变程度与左心室射血分数可以增加预测价值的精确性。

关键词(KeyWords)： 心肌梗死;血管成形术,经皮,经腔冠状动脉;危险因素;预后

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 陈一文,秦明照

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Keeley EC,Boura JA,Grines CL.Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:a quantitative reviewof23randomised trials.Lancet,2003,361:13-20.
• [2]Grines CL,Browne KF,Marco J,et al.Acomparison of immediate angioplasty withthrombolytic therapyfor acute myocardial infarction.NEngl J Med,1993,328:673-679.
• [3]Gibbons RJ,Holmes DR,Reeder GS,et al.Immediate angioplasty compared withthe administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med,1993,328:685-691.
• [4]MorrowDA,Antman EM,Chalesworth A,et al.TIMI riskscore for STelevation myocardial infarction:a convenient,bedside,clinical score for risk assessment at presentation.Circulation,2000,102:2031-2037.
• [5]Lee KL,Woodlief LH,Topol E,et al.Predictors of30-day mortality inthe era of reperfusionfor acute myocardial infarction.Circulation,1995,91:1659-1668.
• [6]Hillis LD,Forman S,Braunwald E.Risk stratification before thrombolyitic therapyin patients withacute myocardial infarction:the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction(TIMI)Phase II co-investigators.J AmColl Cardiol,1990,16:313-315.
• [7]Rouleau JL,Talajic M,Sussex B,et al.Myocardial infarction patientsinthe1990s:their riskfactors,stratification and survival in Canada:the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction(CAMI)Study.J AmColl Cardiol,1996,27:1119-1127.
• [8]Normand ST,Glickman ME,Sharma RG,et al.Using admission characteristics to predict short-term mortality from myocardial infarction in elderly patients:results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.JAMA,1996,275:1322-1328.
• [9]Jacobs DR,Kroenke C,Crow R,et al.PREDICT:a simple risk score for clinical severity andlong-termprognosis after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina:the Minnesota Heart Survey.Circulation,1999,100:599-607.
• [10]Addala S,Grines CL,Dixon SR,et al.Predicting mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PAMI risk score).Am J Cardiol,2004,93:629-632.
• [11]Weintraub WS.Prediction score after myocardial infarction walue,limitations,and future drections.Circulation,2002,106:2292-2293.