基于血流储备分数的血运重建策略对不同部位冠状动脉病变预后的影响Effect of the revascularization strategy on the prognosis of different locations of coronary artery undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention guided by fractional flow reserve
李全,杨帮国,叶益聪,赵昔良,曾勇
摘要(Abstract):
目的探讨真实世界中基于血流储备分数(FFR)指导下左前降支近段(pLAD)病变与非pLAD病变的不同血运重建策略对临床预后的影响。方法纳入618例在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院接受FFR指导血运重建的冠心病患者,根据病变是否累及pLAD将患者分为pLAD组(289例)和非pLAD组(329例),比较两组患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。采用KaplanMeier法描述生存率,Cox比例风险模型计算组间风险比和多因素校正分析。结果中位随访时间为21.0(17.0,29.0)个月,单因素Cox回归分析显示,pLAD组、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、接受FFR测量血管数、病变血管数、病变数、近段病变数、置入支架数、置入支架总长度和小血管置入支架患者数均与MACE的发生率增加相关(均P<0.05)。多元Cox比例风险回归模型显示,pLAD组(HR 2.480,95%CI 1.26~4.87,P=0.008)和置入支架数(HR 1.546,95%CI1.08~2.21,P=0.017)是MACE的独立预测因素。结论基于FFR指导血运重建的临床实践中,病变累及pLAD和置入支架数量均与冠心病患者的不良预后相关。
关键词(KeyWords): 左前降支近段;血流储备分数;血运重建策略;预后
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金(82070301)
作者(Author): 李全,杨帮国,叶益聪,赵昔良,曾勇
参考文献(References):
- [1] Roguin A, Camenzind E, Kerner A, et al. Long-term outcomes of stenting the proximal left anterior descending artery in the PROTECT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2017, 10(6):548-556.
- [2] Calais F, Lagerqvist B, Leppert J, et al. Proximal coronary artery intervention:stent thrombosis, restenosis and death. Int J Cardiol,2013, 170(2):227-232.
- [3] Lemos PA, Hoye A, Goedhart D, et al. Clinical, angiographic,and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimuseluting stent implantation in complex patients:an evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital(RESEARCH)study. Circulation,2004,109(11):1366-1370.
- [4] Li Q, Yu X, He J, et al. The relationship between revascularization extent and the long-term prognosis of patients with stable angina pectoris and three-vessel disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of drug-eluting stents. Clin Cardiol, 2014, 37(9):566-575.
- [5] De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional fl ow reserveguided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(11):991-1001.
- [6] Layland J, Oldroyd KG, Curzen N, et al. Fractional fl ow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial. Eur Heart J,2015, 36(2):100-111.
- [7] Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis:5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 49(21):2105-2111.
- [8] Fukunaga M, Fujii K, Mintz GS, et al. Distribution of pressure gradients along the left anterior descending artery in patients with angiographic ally normal arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2020, 96(1):E67-E74.
- [9]《中国冠状动脉血流储备分数测定技术临床路径专家共识》专家组.中国冠状动脉血流储备分数测定技术临床路径专家共识.中国介入心脏病学杂志,2019,27(3):121-133.
- [10] Myers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, et al. CASS registry long term surgical survival. Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33(2):488-498.
- [11] Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal defi nition of myocardial infarction(2018). J Am Coll Cardiol,2018, 72(18):2231-2264.
- [12] Kennedy MW, Fabris E, Ijsselmuiden AJ, et al. Combined optical coherence tomography morphologic and fractional flow reserve hemodynamic assessment of non-culprit lesions to better predict adverse event outcomes in diabetes mellitus patients:COMBINE(OCT-FFR)prospective study. Rationale and design.Cardiovasc Diabetol, 2016, 15(1):144.
- [13] Nam CW, Hur SH, Cho YK, et al. Relation of fractional fl ow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes.Am J Cardiol, 2011, 107(12):1763-1767.
- [14] Yaeger IA. A multi-artery fractional fl ow reserve(FFR)approach for handling coronary stenosis-stenosis interaction in the multi-vessel disease(MVD)arena. Int J Cardiol, 2016, 203:807-815.